Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A formal directive or grant of permission issued by an administrative agency charged with interpreting or enforcing a law. Reliance on such an order later determined to be invalid or erroneous supplies a defense to criminal liability when the reliance is reasonable.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Export Classification Reliance
Aaron Adams requested a written classification ruling from the federal trade office before shipping navigation components. The ruling stated the parts were not controlled. Aaron exported the parts in reliance on that statement. When a later agency determination found the classification erroneous, the reasonable reliance on the administrative order established a defense to the export charge.
Enforcement Order Challenge
Apex Dynamics received an administrative order imposing price controls during wartime. The company complied with the order while challenging its constitutionality in enforcement proceedings. The order remained binding until reviewed, and violations carried criminal penalties even though the underlying validity was contested in court.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Model Codes
Common Law
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Yakus v. United States321 U.S. 414 (1944)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When does reasonable reliance on an administrative order excuse criminal liability?+
The defense applies when a person acts in reasonable reliance on an official statement contained in an administrative order or grant of permission issued by the public officer or body charged with interpreting or enforcing the law. The order must later be determined invalid or erroneous. The defendant must prove the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
Supporting sources
Does common law recognize a defense based on reliance on an erroneous administrative order?+
Common law did not permit a defense based on reliance on an incorrect official statement of the law. This rule applied even when the erroneous statement appeared in an administrative order or grant.
Supporting sources
What must a defendant show to prove the administrative-order reliance defense?+
The defendant must show that the administrative order came from the agency charged with responsibility for the law, that the reliance was reasonable, and that the order was later found invalid or erroneous. Proof is by a preponderance of the evidence.
Supporting sources
321 U.S. 414 (1944)Constitutional Law
…proceedings, still less when these are civil in character and the later enforcement phase is criminal. In the enforcement of administrative orders the courts have been assiduous, perhaps at times extremely so,[^maj-24] to see that constitutional protections to the persons affected are observed. By trial and error, ways have been found…