Also known as:appreciates · appreciated · appreciating · appreciation
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
3 senses
1
in criminal law
The capacity to recognize the nature and wrongfulness of one's conduct. This capacity is a required element for criminal responsibility under standards that excuse liability when mental disease or defect substantially impairs the ability to form that recognition.
2
in property law
Sense 1
1
in criminal law
The capacity to recognize the nature and wrongfulness of one's conduct. This capacity is a required element for criminal responsibility under standards that excuse liability when mental disease or defect substantially impairs the ability to form that recognition.
See Our Sources· 2 primary sources
Model Codes
Sense 2
2
in property law
An increase in the value of property. Such an increase may be classified as marital or individual property depending on the source of the appreciation and applicable statutory rules governing division upon dissolution.
See Our Sources· 2 primary sources
Uniform Acts
Sense 3
3
in professional conduct
An expression of thanks or recognition through a nominal gift. Such gifts are permitted when they are not intended or reasonably expected to serve as compensation for client referrals.
An increase in the value of property. Such an increase may be classified as marital or individual property depending on the source of the appreciation and applicable statutory rules governing division upon dissolution.
3
in professional conduct
An expression of thanks or recognition through a nominal gift. Such gifts are permitted when they are not intended or reasonably expected to serve as compensation for client referrals.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
Examples3
Insanity Defense Evaluation
Alexis Archer, suffering from untreated schizophrenia, set fire to an abandoned warehouse believing the flames would summon protective spirits. At trial she introduced psychiatric evidence that her delusions prevented her from recognizing the act as criminal. The court instructed the jury to determine whether she lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct under the governing standard.
Sentencing Mitigation Evidence
Alice Atkins was convicted of embezzlement. At the penalty phase she offered expert testimony that bipolar disorder had impaired her ability to appreciate the criminality of her actions. The court admitted the evidence for consideration in deciding between imprisonment and a lesser sentence.
Investor Understanding of Risk
Apollo Energy shareholders sued after a merger announcement caused stock price movement. The defense argued that investors could appreciate the inherent uncertainty of mergers even without disclosure of preliminary talks. The court considered whether the market understood that such transactions remain risky until closing.
Basic Inc. v. Levinson485 U.S. [224], at 238 1988
Basic Incorporated was a publicly traded company primarily engaged in manufacturing chemical refractories for the steel industry. As early as 1965 or 1966 Combustion Engineering expressed interest in acquiring Basic but was deterred by antitrust concerns. In 1976 regulatory action removed the antitrust barrier and Combustion's strategic plan listed an objective to acquire Basic for thirty million dollars.
Beginning in September 1976 Combustion representatives met and spoke by telephone with Basic officers and directors about a possible merger. During 1977 and 1978 Basic issued three public statements denying that merger negotiations were under way. On December 18 1978 Basic asked the New York Stock Exchange to suspend trading in its shares and announced it had been approached by another company concerning a merger.
The next day Basic's board endorsed Combustion's offer of forty-six dollars per share. On December 20 1978 Basic publicly announced approval of Combustion's tender offer for all outstanding shares. Respondents are former Basic shareholders who sold their stock after Basic's October 21 1977 public statement and before the December 1978 trading suspension.
Respondents brought a class action against Basic and its directors alleging that the three statements violated section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 by misleading the market and causing sales at artificially depressed prices. The District Court certified the class under a presumption of reliance but granted summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that any misstatements were immaterial. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed class certification reversed the summary judgment and remanded the case. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
How does the Model Penal Code define the capacity to appreciate criminality?
The Code excuses responsibility when mental disease or defect substantially impairs the defendant's capacity to appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of conduct. The impairment must be substantial rather than total and must exist at the time of the offense.
Supporting sources
What evidence is admissible to show impaired capacity to appreciate wrongfulness?
Evidence that mental disease or defect impaired the defendant's capacity to appreciate the criminality of conduct is admissible at sentencing when the jury or court may choose between death and imprisonment.
Supporting sources
Examples2
Marital Property Classification
Ava Adebayo inherited a parcel of land before marriage. During the marriage the land's value rose sharply because of rezoning. Upon divorce the court examined whether the appreciation resulted from the spouse's efforts or from passive market forces to decide whether any portion qualified as marital property.
Equitable Distribution Factors
Alfred Ashford and his spouse accumulated investment accounts over twenty years of marriage. At dissolution the court weighed each party's contributions to the preservation and appreciation of those assets, along with their respective needs and earning capacities, before ordering an equitable division.
2 common questions
Students Frequently Ask...
When is appreciation of property treated as marital rather than individual?
Appreciation of a spouse's individual property remains individual unless it is classified as marital under statutory rules such as those governing substantial contributions by the other spouse or commingling that changes the character of the asset.
Supporting sources
Does a statement that property will appreciate constitute actionable misrepresentation?
A prediction that an asset will appreciate is ordinarily treated as an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact and therefore does not support a misrepresentation claim unless accompanied by a false assertion of existing fact.
Supporting sources
1
Referral Gift Compliance
Arthur Abrams, a solo practitioner, sent a $25 gift card to a local real-estate agent who had referred a client. The agent had no expectation of payment and the card was accompanied by a note thanking the agent for the introduction. Abrams documented that the gift was not intended as compensation and complied with the nominal-value limit.
1 common questions
Students Frequently Ask...
May a lawyer give a gift to thank someone for a referral?
A lawyer may give a nominal gift as an expression of appreciation provided the gift is neither intended nor reasonably expected to compensate the recipient for recommending the lawyer's services.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)
…and then to examine the state purposes and interests behind the criminal abortion laws. II It perhaps is not generally appreciated that the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage. Those laws, generally proscribing abortion or its attempt at any time…