Also known as:ARMs · adjustable rate mortgage · adjustable-rate mortgage
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
4 senses
1
constitutional law
A weapon. The Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear such items.
2
secured transactions
Sense 1
1
constitutional law
A weapon. The Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear such items.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Constitution
Examples
Sense 2
2
secured transactions
A mechanical device such as a robotic arm used in manufacturing. A security interest may continue in the device after it becomes an accession or fixture.
Sources & Authorities· 2 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Practice Essays
Sense 3
3
contract and property
A transaction between parties with no special relationship. Such dealings are treated as ordinary commercial bargains without donative intent or overreaching.
Sources & Authorities· 2 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Sense 4
4
civil procedure
Jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant based on contacts with the forum state. The presence of property alone does not automatically confer such jurisdiction.
Sources & Authorities· 1 source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
A mechanical device such as a robotic arm used in manufacturing. A security interest may continue in the device after it becomes an accession or fixture.
3
contract and property
A transaction between parties with no special relationship. Such dealings are treated as ordinary commercial bargains without donative intent or overreaching.
4
civil procedure
Jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant based on contacts with the forum state. The presence of property alone does not automatically confer such jurisdiction.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
3
Homeowner Keeps Firearm
Adam Anderson purchases a handgun for self-defense at his residence. State police attempt to confiscate it under a new registration law. The court holds that the Second Amendment prevents the infringement on Anderson's ability to keep the weapon.
Family Living Arrangement Challenged
Angela Acosta lives with extended relatives in a single home. The city enforces an ordinance limiting household composition. The court analyzes whether the restriction infringes protected liberties including the right to keep and bear arms as part of the broader liberty interest.
Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio431 U.S. 494, 503 (1977)
State Restricts Firearm Possession
Aisha Ahmed challenges a statute banning certain weapons. The court considers whether the restriction falls within the liberty protected by due process, referencing the right to keep and bear arms among other enumerated guarantees.
Roe v. Wade410 U.S. 113 (1973)
Frequently Asked1
Does the Second Amendment protect modern firearms?+
The amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. Courts apply the text to contemporary weapons while recognizing historical limitations on dangerous or unusual arms.
Supporting sources
Examples1
Expert Testimony on Birth Defects
Amber Alonzo alleges that a pharmaceutical caused limb reduction defects in her child. Experts testify about the drug's effects on development of arms and legs. The court evaluates whether the scientific evidence meets admissibility standards for the claims.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.509 U.S. 579, 592 (1993)
Frequently Asked1
When does a security interest continue in a robotic arm after installation?+
A security interest continues in an accession under UCC Article 9 if the arm retains its identity and can be removed. Priority then turns on the timing of perfection and whether the interest is a purchase-money security interest.
Supporting sources
Practice Essays
Examples1
Bakers Challenge Labor Law
Alliance Holdings operates a bakery subject to maximum-hours legislation. The owners argue the statute interferes with freedom of contract in an arm's-length employment relationship. The court examines whether the regulation exceeds constitutional limits on state power.
Lochner v. New York198 U.S. 45 (1905)
Frequently Asked1
What makes a transaction arm's length?+
Parties deal at arm's length when they have no special relationship and negotiate without donative intent. Courts treat the resulting bargain as ordinary commercial dealing rather than a gift or overreaching.
Supporting sources
1
Nonresident Shareholder Sued
Anita Ali, a nonresident, owns shares in a Delaware corporation. A plaintiff seeks to assert jurisdiction over Ali in Delaware based solely on the shares' presence there. The court rejects the claim because property ownership alone does not establish the required minimum contacts.
Shaffer v. Heitner433 U.S. 186 (1977)
Frequently Asked1
Does ownership of property in the forum support long-arm jurisdiction?+
Mere ownership of property does not automatically confer personal jurisdiction. The defendant must have minimum contacts with the forum such that jurisdiction comports with fair play and substantial justice.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…points pricked out in terms of the taking of property; the freedom of speech, press, and religion; the right to keep and bear arms; the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; and so on. It is a rational continuum which, broadly speaking, includes a freedom from all substantial arbitrary impositions and…