Also known as:bar admissions · admission to the bar
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
2 senses
1
admission to practice law
The process by which a state grants an applicant the privilege to practice law. Authorities evaluate character and fitness through inquiries into past conduct that rationally relate to the ability to represent clients competently and honestly.
2
Sense 1
1
admission to practice law
The process by which a state grants an applicant the privilege to practice law. Authorities evaluate character and fitness through inquiries into past conduct that rationally relate to the ability to represent clients competently and honestly.
Sources & Authorities· 3 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Sense 2
2
admission of evidence
The introduction of evidence at trial. A court decides whether particular statements or records meet constitutional or evidentiary standards for admission.
Sources & Authorities· 2 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
The introduction of evidence at trial. A court decides whether particular statements or records meet constitutional or evidentiary standards for admission.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
Examples4
Bankruptcy Filing and Character Review
Bobby Brady discharged substantial student loans in bankruptcy shortly before applying for bar admission. The character committee reviewed the filing as evidence of financial irresponsibility. The committee denied admission after determining that the conduct reflected a lack of responsibility relevant to client trust account management.
Residency Requirement Challenged
Barbara Bennett, licensed in State A, sought admission without examination in State B while keeping her home in State A. State B denied the application solely for lack of residency. Bennett sued, arguing that the rule discriminated against nonresidents in the pursuit of a common calling without substantial justification.
Reciprocal Admission Barrier
Brendan Burns applied for reciprocal admission in State C while residing in State D. State C required in-state residency for reciprocal applicants even though Burns met all professional qualifications. Burns challenged the rule as an unjustified burden on nonresidents' right to practice law under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
Targeted Direct-Mail Solicitation
Blake Butler, a personal-injury lawyer, sent targeted letters to accident victims offering representation. The state bar association sought to discipline him under a rule banning such solicitations. Butler challenged the rule as an unconstitutional restriction on commercial speech by lawyers.
Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association486 U.S. 466 (1988)
Frequently Asked3
Can a state deny bar admission based on an applicant's bankruptcy filing?+
Yes. A bankruptcy filing that discharges student loans may be treated as evidence of financial irresponsibility when the conduct rationally relates to fitness to practice law.
Supporting sources
Does a state residency requirement for bar admission violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause?+
Yes when the requirement discriminates against nonresidents in the pursuit of the common calling of law practice without substantial justification.
Supporting sources
What duty does a lawyer have when providing information about an applicant for bar admission?+
A lawyer must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact in connection with a bar admission application.
Supporting sources
2
DNA Report and Primary Purpose
Bradley Banks faced trial for sexual assault. The prosecution offered a DNA profile report prepared before any suspect was identified. The defense objected on confrontation grounds. The court admitted the report after finding it was created for forensic identification rather than to accuse a targeted individual.
Williams v. Illinois567 U.S. 50 (2012)
Police Interrogation Statements
Brittany Bell was prosecuted for assault. The state sought to introduce statements the complainant made during a police interview. The defense moved to exclude the statements as testimonial hearsay. The court barred admission because the statements were made during interrogation and the declarant was unavailable for cross-examination.
Crawford v. Washington541 U.S. 36 (2004)
Frequently Asked1
When are out-of-court statements barred from admission under the Confrontation Clause?+
Testimonial statements are barred unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
Supporting sources
541 U.S. 36 (2004)Evidence
…not only about the desirability of reliable evidence, but about how reliability can best be determined. The Clause does not bar admission of a statement so long as the declarant is unavailable and the statement bears indicia of reliability. Where testimonial statements are involved, the Framers clearly intended to exclude…