/sur-kum-STAN-shul GAR-un-teez of TRUST-wur-thee-ness/·phrase
Also known as:circumstantial guarantee of trustworthiness · guarantees of trustworthiness
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A set of surrounding circumstances that render a hearsay statement sufficiently reliable for admission under the residual exception to the hearsay rule. Courts evaluate the totality of those circumstances plus any corroborating evidence to determine whether the statement carries guarantees equivalent to those in the enumerated exceptions.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Analytics Report Admission
Orion Foods offered a subscription real estate analytics report showing average rents for comparable properties. Brokers in the neighborhood routinely consulted the report when negotiating leases. The court found the occupational reliance supplied the necessary circumstantial guarantees and admitted the report over the hearsay objection.
Co-Conspirator Statement Evaluation
The government sought to introduce statements made by an alleged co-conspirator during a recorded phone call. Cynthia Cortez testified that other evidence independently confirmed the speaker's involvement in the charged conspiracy. The court considered the corroboration when assessing whether the statements carried sufficient circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Federal Rules
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Bourjaily v. United States483 U.S. 171, 107 S.Ct. 2775, 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987)
Against-Interest Statement Review
A corrections officer told a colleague that he had falsified wellness logs and ignored an inmate's medical pleas. The colleague later testified at trial after the officer invoked the Fifth Amendment. The court examined the self-incriminating nature of the remarks together with surrounding facts to decide whether circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness existed.
Williamson v. United States512 U.S. 594 (1994)
Child Statement to Doctor
A young child described an assault to a treating physician shortly after the incident. Claire Campbell, the child's mother, confirmed the timing and the child's emotional state. The court weighed the medical setting and the child's spontaneous account when determining whether the statement possessed circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
White v. Illinois502 U.S. 346 (1992)
Unavailable Witness Transcript
A witness gave prior testimony at a preliminary hearing but later became unavailable. The prosecution offered the transcript at trial. The court reviewed the circumstances of the earlier examination, including cross-examination opportunities, to assess whether the testimony carried circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
Ohio v. Roberts448 U.S. 56, 64-66 (1980)
Preschool Teacher Report
A three-year-old told a preschool teacher that an adult had caused bruises on the child's body. Charlotte Chung, the teacher, recorded the statement immediately after the child made it. The court considered the child's age, the setting, and the absence of any motive to fabricate when evaluating circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
Ohio v. Clark135 S. Ct. 2173 (2015)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What factors do courts examine when deciding whether a hearsay statement has circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness?+
Courts consider the totality of circumstances under which the statement was made, including the declarant's motive, the timing of the statement, and any corroborating evidence. The residual exception requires that these guarantees be equivalent to those found in the enumerated hearsay exceptions.
Supporting sources
Does the residual exception require the declarant to be unavailable?+
No. The residual exception in Rule 807 does not require unavailability of the declarant. It focuses instead on whether the statement carries sufficient circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness and meets the other statutory requirements.
Supporting sources
Can a statement that nearly fits a specific hearsay exception still qualify under the residual exception?+
Courts generally reject the near-miss theory. If a statement falls just outside a specific exception, it must independently demonstrate equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness rather than rely on its proximity to an enumerated category.
Supporting sources
How does corroborating evidence affect the trustworthiness analysis?+
Corroboration by other evidence can strengthen the case for admissibility under the residual exception. Courts treat corroboration as one factor within the totality of circumstances when evaluating whether the statement possesses sufficient circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
Supporting sources
541 U.S. 36 (2004)Evidence
…the conviction, concluding that the statement did not violate the Confrontation Clause because it bore “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” Held: The State’s use of petitioner’s wife’s statement violated the Confrontation Clause because, where testimonial statements are at issue, the only indicium of reliability sufficient…