Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A party asserting a right or demand in a legal proceeding. The term encompasses plaintiffs in civil actions, mortgagees in foreclosure, and persons seeking recognition of interests such as easements.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Foreclosure by Mortgage Holder
Central Dynamics held a note secured by a mortgage on Cedar Creek Farms. After default, Central Dynamics initiated foreclosure and joined all junior lienholders as required by state statute. The court confirmed that Central Dynamics, as the primary claimant, could proceed to sale once notice was properly given to every necessary party.
Request for Waiver of Service
Claire Campbell filed suit against Compass Logistics and sent a written notice requesting waiver of summons. Compass Logistics accepted the request and avoided the expense of formal service. The court later noted that Claire, as claimant, had properly invoked the waiver procedure under the federal rules.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Common Law
Restatements
Craig Caldwell brought a derivative action on behalf of Cardinal Insurance. After the board rejected the demand, Craig had to plead specific facts showing that the rejection failed to satisfy the statutory prerequisites. The court dismissed the claim because Craig, as claimant, had not met the particularity requirement.
Easement Necessity Claim
Caleb Chang sought an easement across neighboring land to reach a landlocked parcel. The court weighed the extent of necessity to Caleb as claimant along with other factors listed in the Restatement. Because the necessity was substantial, the easement was granted.
Res Ipsa Loquitur Application
Corinne Cho was injured when equipment fell in a store owned by Cedar Creek Farms. The court applied res ipsa loquitur after finding that the negligence was within the scope of the store's duty to Corinne as claimant. The jury was permitted to infer liability from the circumstances.
Federal Question Jurisdiction
Cameron Cruz alleged that federal officers violated his constitutional rights and sought damages directly under the Constitution. The court held that federal question jurisdiction existed even without an express statutory cause of action because Cameron, as claimant, had asserted a federal right to relief.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
Who qualifies as a claimant in a foreclosure action?+
The mortgagee or note holder is typically the claimant. State statutes also require joinder of the mortgagor and may require joinder of junior lienholders and tenants so that all interests are addressed before sale.
Supporting sources
What must a claimant plead in a corporate derivative action after a board rejects the demand?+
The claimant must allege with particularity facts showing that the board's determination did not satisfy statutory prerequisites. Failure to do so prevents the claimant from contesting the rejection.
Supporting sources
How does the term claimant function in easement disputes?+
The claimant is the party seeking recognition of the easement. Courts evaluate the extent of necessity to that claimant along with other factors such as prior use and reciprocal benefits.
Supporting sources
Does a claimant in a res ipsa loquitur case need to prove the defendant's duty separately?+
The claimant must still show that the indicated negligence falls within the scope of the defendant's duty. The doctrine supplies an inference of breach but does not eliminate the duty element.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…is that a litigant may assert only his own constitutional rights or immunities. The rule has no application where, as here, the plaintiff is himself or herself the immediate object of the challenged statute. Pp. 123-129. (b) The Does' complaint based on their own and their wives' alleged injury from the future possibility of…