Also known as: definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed · clearly erroneous
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard applied by appellate courts when reviewing factual findings from a bench trial. An appellate court may set aside such findings only if, after reviewing the entire record, it is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. The standard requires deference to the trial court's opportunity to judge witness credibility.
BrightGrain LLC sued SteelTech Corp alleging a defective machine and inadequate warnings. After a nonjury trial the judge credited SteelTech engineers over line workers and found adequate warnings. On appeal BrightGrain challenged the factual findings. The appellate court applied the definite and firm conviction of error standard and affirmed because the trial judge's credibility assessments were supported by the record.
South Carolina challenged federal preclearance requirements under the Voting Rights Act. The district court made factual findings about discriminatory practices in the state. On appeal the reviewing court examined whether those findings left it with a definite and firm conviction of error. The court upheld the findings after giving due regard to the trial court's credibility determinations.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Washington challenged his death sentence on habeas claiming counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The state court made factual findings about counsel's performance. On federal review the court applied the definite and firm conviction of error standard to those findings. The court deferred to the trial-level credibility assessments and denied relief.
Williams appealed his sentence after the trial court made factual findings about prior convictions. The appellate court reviewed those findings under the definite and firm conviction of error standard. Because the record supported the trial court's credibility judgments the appellate court affirmed.
Anderson sued the city after the trial court found no discrimination based on witness testimony. On appeal Anderson argued the findings were clearly erroneous. The appellate court applied the definite and firm conviction of error standard and upheld the findings after according deference to the trial judge's credibility assessments.
Ankenbrandt sued her former spouse in federal court over child custody issues. The district court made factual findings about the parties' conduct and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On appeal the reviewing court applied the definite and firm conviction of error standard to those findings and affirmed the dismissal.
It means the appellate court, after examining the entire record, is convinced that the trial judge made a mistake in its factual findings. The standard is intentionally deferential and does not permit reversal merely because the appellate court would have weighed the evidence differently.
Supporting sources
Yes. Under the rules a party may later question the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the findings whether or not it requested findings, objected to them, or moved to amend them. This preserves the ability to argue clear error on appeal.
Supporting sources
The standard requires special deference to the trial court's credibility findings because the trial judge had the opportunity to observe witnesses' demeanor. An appellate court may not reverse merely because it would have credited different testimony.
Supporting sources
Only when the findings are clearly erroneous, meaning the appellate court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made after reviewing the entire record. The rule also requires giving due regard to the trial court's credibility assessments.
Supporting sources
…See also 7 Record 648-649. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) requires that "[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous," and neither Rudzewicz nor the Court of Appeals has pointed to record evidence that would support a "definite and firm conviction" that the District Court's findings are mistaken. United…