Also known as:die intestate · dies intestate · dying intestate · intestacy · intestate succession
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
The condition of a person who dies without having executed a valid will. Property owned at death therefore passes according to the jurisdiction's intestacy statute rather than by devise.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
6
Advancement Against Share
Dwight Dorsey gave his daughter Denise $50,000 during his lifetime to help her buy a home. When Dwight died intestate, Denise was his only surviving heir. Because Dwight left a contemporaneous writing stating the gift counted toward her share, the probate court treated the transfer as an advancement and reduced Denise's intestate distribution accordingly.
Title Passes by Statute
Diego Duarte owned a warehouse in his sole name. After he died intestate, his surviving spouse received the property under the state's statute of descent and distribution. No deed from Diego was required. Title transferred directly by operation of law.
Dustin Donovan's will left a remainder interest to his descendants without specifying shares. When the interest became possessory, the court divided the property among the living descendants in the proportions they would have taken had Dustin died intestate owning the asset at that moment.
Fractional Interests Escheat
Doris Duffy, an enrolled tribal member, died intestate owning several small undivided interests in allotted land. Under the federal statute then in force, the interests passed to the tribe rather than to her heirs because the parcels fell below the statutory size threshold.
Hodel v. Irving481 U.S. 704 (1987)
In the late 19th century, Congress enacted a series of land acts that divided communal Indian reservations into individual allotments for Indians and unallotted lands for non-Indian settlement. The Act of March 2, 1889, allotted 320 acres to each male Sioux head of household and 160 acres to most other individuals on the Great Reservation of the Sioux Nation, with the allotted lands held in trust by the United States.
Ownership of these allotted lands fragmented over successive generations into numerous undivided interests, with some parcels having hundreds of owners. Because the land was held in trust and often could not be alienated or partitioned, the fractionation problem grew over time.
This created administrative difficulties and economic waste. A 1928 report and comprehensive 1960 House and Senate studies indicated that one-half of approximately 12 million acres of allotted trust lands were held in fractionated ownership. In 1983, Congress enacted the Indian Land Consolidation Act. Section 207 provided that no undivided fractional interest in any tract of trust or restricted land within a tribe's reservation shall descend by intestacy or devise but shall escheat to the tribe if such interest represents 2 per centum or less of the total acreage in such tract and has earned to its owner less than $100 in the preceding year before it is due to escheat. The provision was signed into law on January 12, 1983, and became effective immediately, with no compensation provided to owners of escheated interests.
Four enrolled members of the Oglala Sioux Tribe died in 1983 while owning fractional interests subject to the escheat provision. Chester Irving died on March 18, Mary Poor Bear-Little Hoop Cross died on March 23, Charles Leroy Pumpkin Seed died on April 2, and Edgar Pumpkin Seed died on June 23. Collectively the four decedents owned 41 such interests whose values included approximately $100 for the two interests lost by the Irving estate, approximately $2,700 for the 26 interests in the Cross estate, and approximately $1,816 for the 13 interests in the Pumpkin Seed estates.
The three appellees are enrolled members of the Oglala Sioux Tribe who are or represent heirs or devisees of the decedents. Mary Irving is the daughter of Chester Irving, Eileen Bissonette is the guardian for the five minor children of Mary Poor Bear-Little Hoop Cross, and Patrick Pumpkin Seed is the son of Charles Leroy Pumpkin Seed and nephew of Edgar Pumpkin Seed. But for the escheat provision the fractional interests would have passed to the appellees or those they represent. Appellees filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota claiming that the escheat provision resulted in a taking of property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The District Court granted summary judgment for the Government. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Denise Donovan died intestate survived by her daughter born out of wedlock. The daughter presented a court-ordered paternity judgment and a written acknowledgment from Denise. The probate court recognized the daughter as an heir entitled to the entire estate under the applicable intestacy statute.
Trimble v. Gordon430 U.S. 762, 775 n.16 (1977)
Deta Mona Trimble is the illegitimate daughter of Jessie Trimble and Sherman Gordon. Trimble and Gordon lived together in Chicago with Deta Mona from 1970 until Gordon died in 1974 as the victim of a homicide. On January 2, 1973, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, entered a paternity order finding Gordon to be the father of Deta Mona and ordering him to pay fifteen dollars per week for her support. Gordon thereafter supported Deta Mona in accordance with the paternity order and openly acknowledged her as his child.
Gordon died intestate at the age of twenty-eight, leaving an estate consisting only of a 1974 Plymouth automobile worth approximately twenty-five hundred dollars. Shortly after Gordon's death, Trimble, as the mother and next friend of Deta Mona, filed a petition for letters of administration, determination of heirship, and declaratory relief in the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County. That court entered an order determining heirship, identifying as the only heirs of Gordon his father Joseph Gordon, his mother Ethel King, and his brother, two sisters, and a half brother. The Circuit Court excluded Deta Mona on the authority of section twelve of the Illinois Probate Act.
The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court on the authority of its earlier decision in In re Estate of Karas. The United States Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction to consider the arguments that section twelve violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by invidiously discriminating on the basis of illegitimacy and sex.
Diane Dawson died intestate leaving two children born during his marriage and one child born outside the marriage. The out-of-wedlock child could not produce the specific form of proof required by state statute. The court therefore excluded that child from the intestate distribution.
Lalli v. Lalli439 U.S. 259 (1978)
Robert Lalli claims to be the illegitimate son of Mario Lalli, who died intestate on January 7, 1973, in New York. Robert’s mother, who died in 1968, was never married to Mario. After Mario’s widow, Rosamond Lalli, was appointed administratrix of the estate, Robert and his sister Maureen petitioned the Surrogate’s Court for Westchester County for a compulsory accounting, asserting their entitlement to inherit as Mario’s children.
Rosamond Lalli opposed the petition. She argued that Robert and Maureen had not obtained an order of filiation during Mario’s lifetime as required by New York Estates, Powers, and Trusts Law § 4-1.2. Robert conceded the absence of such an order. He presented evidence. This included a notarized document in which Mario referred to him as “my son” when consenting to his marriage. There were also affidavits from individuals stating that Mario had openly acknowledged Robert and Maureen as his children.
The Surrogate’s Court ruled that Robert and Maureen were excluded as distributees. On direct appeal, the New York Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. While the case was pending before the United States Supreme Court, the Court decided Trimble v. Gordon and vacated and remanded for further consideration.
On remand, the New York Court of Appeals adhered to its prior disposition. The Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction and heard the case.
When a decedent dies intestate, who receives the estate if only a spouse survives?
Under typical modern intestacy statutes, the surviving spouse takes the entire estate when the decedent leaves no surviving descendants and no surviving parents.
Supporting sources
Does an informal family relationship create inheritance rights when someone dies intestate?
No. Intestacy statutes require a legal parent-child relationship created by biology or formal adoption. Informal adoption or affectionate references do not qualify a person as a descendant entitled to inherit.
Supporting sources
How does a missing parent affect the surviving spouse's share when the decedent dies intestate?
A parent who has disappeared but has not been declared dead by a court is treated as not surviving. The surviving spouse therefore takes the entire intestate estate.
Supporting sources
What share does a surviving spouse receive when the decedent dies intestate leaving a child from a prior relationship?
The spouse receives the first $150,000 plus one-half of the remaining balance under UPC § 2-102(4) because at least one descendant is not also a descendant of the surviving spouse.
Supporting sources
What share does a surviving spouse receive when the decedent dies intestate leaving parents but no descendants?
The spouse receives the first $300,000 plus three-fourths of the remaining balance, with the parents sharing the final one-fourth.
Supporting sources
intestate succession
only from their mothers. Under Illinois law, legitimate children are allowed to inherit by
intestate succession
from both their mothers and their fathers. I Appellant Deta…