Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An adverbial phrase indicating that a described condition or event actually occurred or exists in reality rather than in appearance or supposition.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Provoked Passion Requirement
Edward Everett argued with his neighbor over a property line and then shot him minutes later. The prosecution introduced evidence that Everett remained calm throughout the encounter. Because Everett did not in fact experience the required passion, the jury convicted him of murder rather than manslaughter.
Spring Gun Privilege
Elena Estrada installed a spring gun inside her remote cabin after repeated break-ins. An intruder entered at night and triggered the device. Because the intrusion was in fact one that Estrada could have repelled with deadly force if present, she avoided liability for the resulting injury.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Common Law
Restatements
Dictionaries
Esther Eisenberg sued a data broker alleging a statutory privacy violation after her personal information appeared online. She alleged no identity theft or other concrete harm. The court dismissed the complaint because the bare statutory breach did not produce an injury in fact.
Religious Housing Exemption
Eclipse Manufacturing operated a dormitory for its employees and allowed a religious organization to limit occupancy to members of one faith. Because the organization was in fact a nonprofit controlled by the religious group and operated the housing for a noncommercial purpose, the Fair Housing Act exemption applied.
Family Allowance Eligibility
After Emanuel Escobar died, his surviving spouse sought a family allowance from the estate. Two adult children had lived with and received regular financial support from Escobar before his death. Because those children were in fact being supported by the decedent, the court awarded them a portion of the allowance.
Manifested Assent Despite Internal Dissent
Elysium Media sent a signed contract to a vendor even though its CEO privately believed the terms were unfavorable. The vendor relied on the signature and began performance. Because the company manifested assent even though it did not in fact assent, a contract formed that remained voidable for mistake.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
6
How does the phrase distinguish actual mental state from objective reasonableness in provocation doctrine?+
The phrase requires proof that the defendant subjectively experienced the provoked passion at the moment of the killing, separate from whether an ordinary person would have been provoked.
Supporting sources
When does the phrase determine whether a mechanical device user avoids tort liability?+
The phrase confirms that the actual intrusion matches the type of entry the landowner could have repelled with intentional deadly force if present, thereby triggering the privilege.
Supporting sources
Why does the phrase matter for Article III standing after a statutory violation?+
The phrase requires a plaintiff to show a concrete, particularized harm beyond the bare statutory breach. A purely procedural violation is insufficient.
Supporting sources
How does the phrase limit the religious-organization housing exemption?+
The phrase verifies that the organization is in fact a nonprofit controlled by or affiliated with a religious group and that the housing serves a noncommercial purpose.
Supporting sources
When does the phrase expand family-allowance recipients beyond those the decedent was legally obligated to support?+
The phrase includes children who were in fact receiving financial support from the decedent even if no legal duty existed.
Supporting sources
What consequence follows when conduct manifests assent even though the party does not in fact assent?+
A contract is formed but remains voidable on grounds such as fraud, duress, or mistake.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…of the factors that govern the abortion decision. The privacy right involved, therefore, cannot be said to be absolute. In fact, it is not clear to us that the claim asserted by some amici that one has an unlimited right to do with one's body as one pleases bears a close relationship to the right of privacy…