Also known as: matter of public concern · public concern · public concern doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Speech or expression addressing issues of political, social, or community importance that receives heightened First Amendment protection.
Miguel Mendoza and fellow church members stand on a public sidewalk near a military funeral holding signs criticizing government policy on homosexuality. The family of the deceased sues for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because the signs address political and moral views on matters of public concern, the First Amendment bars tort liability absent additional unprotected conduct.
Mustafa Mahmoud receives a credit report about a small private company circulated only to a handful of subscribers. When the report contains false statements, the company sues for defamation and seeks presumed damages. Because the report concerns a purely private financial matter rather than a matter of public concern, the First Amendment does not require proof of actual malice for presumed or punitive damages.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Michelle Murphy, a private citizen, sues a newspaper for publishing false statements about her role in a local government contract dispute. The statements address a matter of public concern. Murphy must prove the statements false by clear and convincing evidence. The common-law presumption of falsity does not apply.
Malcolm McKinley burns a cross on the lawn of an African-American family. The city charges him under an ordinance banning symbols that arouse anger on the basis of race. Because the ordinance singles out expression on matters of public concern for disfavored treatment based on its message, the First Amendment invalidates the law.
Miles Montgomery, a city commissioner, sues a newspaper over an advertisement criticizing his official conduct. The statements concern matters of public concern. Montgomery must prove actual malice by clear and convincing evidence to recover damages.
Mohan Malhotra, a private attorney, sues a magazine for an article accusing him of unethical conduct in a high-profile public controversy. The article addresses a matter of public concern. Malhotra may recover compensatory damages upon proof of negligence but needs actual malice for presumed or punitive damages.
When speech involves matters of public concern, the First Amendment limits recovery of presumed and punitive damages absent a showing of actual malice. Speech on purely private matters receives less protection, allowing states greater latitude to award such damages without that showing.
Supporting sources
A private-figure plaintiff suing a media defendant must prove the defamatory statements false by clear and convincing evidence. The common-law presumption of falsity is displaced to avoid deterring true speech on public issues.
Supporting sources
Yes. Peaceful picketing expressing political and moral views on matters of public concern near a funeral is protected by the First Amendment. Tort liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress is barred absent additional unprotected conduct.
Supporting sources
A public employee speaking as a citizen on matters of public concern receives protection unless the employer shows adequate justification for treating the employee differently from the general public. Speech primarily addressing internal workplace grievances does not qualify.
Supporting sources
…the communication must show actual malice or go remediless. This privilege extends to a great variety of subjects, and includes matters of public concern, public men, and candidates for office." 78 Kan., at 723, 98 P., at 285. Such a privilege for criticism of official conduct is appropriately analogous to the protection accorded a public…