Also known as:must-carry rule · must carry rules · must carry rule · must-carry · must carry
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A regulatory mandate requiring cable television operators to carry local broadcast stations on their systems. The mandate is evaluated under intermediate scrutiny as a content-neutral regulation of speech.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Cable Operator Challenges Mandate
Mercury Industries operates a regional cable system serving rural households. A federal order requires it to dedicate channel slots to three local broadcast stations whose signals reach the area. Mercury contends the slots displace its preferred programming and reduce advertising revenue. The court applies intermediate scrutiny and upholds the order after finding the preservation of local broadcasting serves an important interest and the displacement affects only a modest portion of available capacity.
Broadcaster Seeks Carriage Rights
Musa Mensah owns a small independent television station whose signal reaches a metropolitan area. The local cable provider refuses to carry the station citing limited bandwidth. Mensah petitions the FCC for must-carry relief. The agency grants the petition after determining that carriage advances the interest in preserving free over-the-air broadcasting without substantially burdening the cable operator's editorial choices.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Operator Claims Viewpoint Discrimination
Majestic Construction launches a cable network focused on commercial real estate programming. A municipal franchise agreement imposes must-carry obligations for all local broadcast stations. Majestic argues the rules favor certain speakers. The reviewing court rejects the claim because the obligations apply evenly to all cable systems and rest on the content-neutral goal of maintaining local broadcast access.
State Attempts Broader Mandate
Magnolia Foods distributes programming via a statewide cable franchise. State legislation expands must-carry rules to include educational channels produced by public universities. Magnolia challenges the expansion as exceeding federal limits. The court sustains the rules after concluding they remain narrowly tailored to the interest in ensuring diverse local content reaches subscribers.
Economic Hardship Defense Raised
Morgan Financial acquires a struggling cable system serving low-income neighborhoods. Compliance with must-carry rules would require costly equipment upgrades. The company seeks an exemption claiming the burden outweighs any public benefit. Regulators deny the request after evidence shows the rules impose only incremental costs while preserving access to local news for thousands of households.
New Entrant Seeks Exemption
Matthew Martinez starts a niche cable service offering foreign-language channels. Local broadcast stations demand carriage under existing must-carry regulations. Martinez argues the rules should not apply to a startup with limited capacity. The FCC enforces the requirements after finding that the interest in local broadcasting remains important and the rules do not foreclose Martinez from offering additional programming.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What level of scrutiny applies to must-carry rules?+
Must-carry rules are treated as content-neutral regulations of speech. They are therefore subject to intermediate scrutiny rather than strict scrutiny. The government must demonstrate that the rules advance an important interest unrelated to the suppression of speech and are narrowly tailored to that interest.
Supporting sources
Does the preservation of local broadcasting qualify as an important governmental interest?+
Yes. Courts have recognized that maintaining a multiplicity of broadcast outlets serves the public interest in receiving diverse local information. This interest is unrelated to suppressing any particular viewpoint and supports the application of must-carry obligations.
Supporting sources
How does a court assess whether must-carry rules are narrowly tailored?+
A court examines whether the rules burden substantially more speech than necessary to achieve the government's interest. Factors include the percentage of channel capacity displaced and the availability of less restrictive alternatives. Modest displacement that still leaves operators room for their own programming typically satisfies the tailoring requirement.
Supporting sources
22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824)Constitutional Law
…part of which is indicated by the term. If this be the admitted meaning of the word, in its application to foreign nations, it must carry the same meaning throughout the sentence, and remain a unit, unless there be some plain intelligible cause which alters it. The subject to which the power is next applied, is to commerce…