Also known as: non-justiciable
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A characteristic of a legal claim or controversy that renders it unsuitable for judicial resolution. Courts decline to adjudicate when the issue presents a political question, has become moot, or fails to present a live case or controversy under Article III.
Nyah Ndlovu sued to enjoin a presidential order directing military aid to an ally. The complaint alleged that the order violated separation of powers. The court dismissed the suit because the Constitution textually commits foreign affairs and military decisions to the executive branch, satisfying the first Baker factor and rendering the claim nonjusticiable.
Nalini Narula filed suit challenging her law school's admissions policy after receiving a denial. Before the case reached final judgment she completed all degree requirements and accepted her diploma. The court dismissed the action as moot because no live controversy remained between the parties.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Nicholas Nunez, a removed federal judge, challenged the Senate's decision to delegate evidence taking to a committee during his impeachment trial. The court dismissed the suit because the Constitution assigns the sole power to try impeachments to the Senate, creating a textually demonstrable commitment that renders the claim nonjusticiable.
Nina Nielsen sued her state, alleging that a new popular referendum process replaced the legislature with direct citizen votes and therefore violated the Guarantee Clause. The court dismissed the complaint because claims that a state lacks a republican form of government present nonjusticiable political questions.
Nigel Nelson sought a declaratory judgment that an unenforced 1920s municipal ordinance banning certain speech was unconstitutional. City officials had never applied the ordinance and had publicly stated they would not enforce it. The court dismissed the action because the hypothetical dispute supplied no live case or controversy.
Nexus Technologies and its employees sued to invalidate a congressional districting plan that allegedly packed their voters into one district to favor the opposing party. The court dismissed the suit because partisan gerrymandering claims present nonjusticiable political questions under the federal Constitution.
A claim is nonjusticiable when any of the six Baker factors is present, including a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment to another branch or a lack of judicially manageable standards.
Supporting sources
Yes. When intervening events eliminate any live controversy so that a judicial decision would have no effect on the parties' rights, the case becomes nonjusticiable.
Supporting sources
Yes. Claims that a state fails to maintain a republican form of government under Article IV present nonjusticiable political questions and are not subject to judicial enforcement.
Supporting sources
A challenge is nonjusticiable when the statute has never been enforced, no realistic threat of enforcement exists, and the dispute remains purely hypothetical.
Supporting sources
Yes. Federal courts will not decide claims that a state drew district lines to favor one political party because such claims present nonjusticiable political questions.
Supporting sources
…States v. Lovett , 328 U. S. 303 (1946). G Political Question It is also argued that these cases present a nonjusticiable political question because Chadha is merely challenging Congress' authority under the Naturalization Clause, U. S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 4, and the Necessary and Proper Clause, U. S.…