Also known as:persuasion burdens · burden of persuasion
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The ultimate obligation of a party to convince the factfinder of the truth of a proposition by the applicable standard of proof.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Will Contest in Probate Court
Dylan petitions for intestacy after his sibling's death and supplies evidence of death, venue, and heirship. Peggy offers a digital document as the will and presents metadata plus testimony to support execution. The court first requires Peggy to meet her initial burden on due execution before Dylan must persuade on lack of capacity.
Presumption in Civil Contract Suit
MetroBuild accepts steel beams and later sues Apex for defects discovered after installation. Apex introduces evidence that the beams met specifications at delivery. The presumption favoring MetroBuild on nonconformity requires Apex only to produce rebuttal evidence. MetroBuild retains the ultimate obligation to persuade the jury of the defect.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Dictionaries
Affirmative Defense in Murder Trial
A defendant charged with second-degree murder presents psychiatric evidence of extreme emotional disturbance. The prosecution proves every element of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant must still persuade the jury by a preponderance that the affirmative defense applies or face conviction.
Patterson v. New York432 U.S. 197, 97 S.Ct. 2319, 53 L.Ed.2d 281
Executive Order Challenge
Steel companies sue to enjoin a presidential order seizing mills during wartime. The government asserts inherent authority to act. The companies must persuade the court that no constitutional power supports the seizure once the government has met its production burden on the factual record.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer343 U.S. 579 (1952)
Corporate Fiduciary Suit
Shareholders challenge a merger approved by a controlling stockholder. The board shows an independent committee approved the deal after review. Plaintiffs retain the obligation to persuade the court that the transaction was not entirely fair despite the procedural protections.
Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp.88 A.3d 635, 648–49 (Del. 2014)
Jury Selection Discrimination Claim
A defendant objects to the prosecutor's peremptory strikes removing all Black venire members. The prosecutor offers race-neutral reasons for each strike. The defendant must persuade the court that the stated reasons are pretextual to obtain relief under equal protection.
Batson v. Kentucky476 U.S. 79, 103 (1986)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
Which party bears the persuasion burden in a contested will proceeding?+
The proponent of the will must persuade the court of due execution. The contestant must persuade the court of lack of capacity, undue influence, or other invalidating grounds. Each party retains the ultimate obligation on the issues it initially raises.
Supporting sources
Does a presumption shift the persuasion burden under the Federal Rules of Evidence?+
A presumption shifts only the burden of production to the opposing party. The party that originally bore the persuasion burden keeps it throughout the case.
Supporting sources
How does the persuasion burden operate for an affirmative defense in a criminal case?+
The prosecution must prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant must persuade the factfinder by a preponderance that an affirmative defense such as extreme emotional disturbance applies.
Supporting sources
What burden applies when a plaintiff challenges a corporate transaction approved by an independent committee?+
The plaintiff retains the obligation to persuade the court that the transaction was not entirely fair even after the corporation shows procedural protections were followed.
Supporting sources
466 U.S. 668 (1984)Criminal Procedure
…658, 104 S.Ct., at 2046. But the adjectives "strong" and "heavy" might be read as imposing upon defendants an unusually weighty burden of persuasion. If that is the majority's intent, I must respectfully dissent. The range of acceptable behavior defined by "prevailing professional norms," ante, at 688, seems to me sufficiently broad to…