/priv-uh-LEJ-iz and im-YOON-i-teez of NASH-uh-nuhl SIT-i-zuhn-ship/·constitutional clause
Also known as:privilege and immunity of national citizenship · national privileges and immunities · privileges or immunities clause · 14th amendment national citizenship rights
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The rights of national citizenship protected against state abridgment by the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These rights include the right to travel interstate and the right of newly arrived residents to receive the same public benefits as longer-term residents.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Welfare Benefits Waiting Period
Patricia Patel moved from State B to State A and applied for welfare benefits six months later. State A limited her benefits to the lower amount available in State B during her first year of residency. The restriction penalized her for exercising the right to travel by denying equal treatment to new residents.
Health Access Program Restriction
Priscilla Parks relocated to New York and sought mental health coverage under the state program. The program withheld full benefits until she completed twelve months of residency. The one-year limit burdened her right to travel by treating new residents unequally in access to public services.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Philip Powell moved to State N for maritime work and applied for supplemental unemployment benefits. The program capped his payments at the lower level from his former state during the first year. The durational rule denied equal treatment to new residents exercising the right to travel.
Food Assistance Formula
Pierre Poulin arrived in State A and applied for food assistance. The agency calculated benefits using his former state's lower schedule for the initial twelve months. The policy created unequal treatment based solely on duration of residency.
Medical Coverage Disparity
Pablo Perez relocated and sought comprehensive medical services under the state program. New arrivals received only limited crisis care until completing one year of residency. The waiting period penalized interstate migration by withholding equal benefits from new residents.
Benefit Level Adjustment
Paige Porter moved for employment and applied for state assistance. Officials reduced her payments to match her prior state's schedule during the first year. The formula imposed unequal treatment on newly arrived residents.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What rights does the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protect?+
The clause protects rights of national citizenship, including the right to travel between states and the right of new residents to equal treatment in public benefits. A state law imposing a one-year waiting period or limiting benefits to prior-state levels violates this protection.
Supporting sources
How does the clause interact with equal protection in right-to-travel cases?+
The clause supplies the textual foundation for the right to travel while equal protection principles reinforce the prohibition on arbitrary distinctions between new and long-term residents. Courts apply heightened scrutiny to durational residency requirements for welfare benefits.
Supporting sources
Does a uniform one-year waiting period for all new residents survive constitutional challenge?+
No. The rule prohibits one-year waiting periods for full benefits regardless of uniform application or fiscal justifications. The distinction based on duration of residency burdens the right to travel.
Supporting sources
What distinguishes this clause from the Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause?+
The Fourteenth Amendment clause protects rights of national citizenship against state interference, while the Article IV clause prevents states from discriminating against citizens of other states. The former focuses on equal treatment for new residents after relocation.
Supporting sources
526 U.S. 489 (1999)Constitutional Law
…— Chief Justice Rehnquist (with whom Justice Thomas joins) The Court today breathes new life into the previously dormant Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In my view, the majority’s analysis is flawed in several respects. First, the CitizenshipClause does not support the broad right to travel that the majority…