Also known as:privies · privy · privity of contract · privy council
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A relationship between parties each having a legally recognized interest in the same subject matter such as a contract or property interest.
See Our Sources· 5 primary sources
Cases
Restatements
How its tested
Common Examples
6
Original Landlord Remains Liable
Harbor Properties leased ground-floor space to MetroBank and expressly promised to maintain vault facilities and backup power. Five years later Harbor sold the building to Apex Capital. MetroBank never released Harbor and sued Harbor when the systems failed. Because Harbor's obligation rested on privity of contract, the sale did not terminate that privity and Harbor remained liable.
Subsequent Buyer Lacks Privity
Patricia Patel bought a newly built home from its first owner. After discovering construction defects she sued the original builder-vendor. Because Patel had no contractual relationship with the builder the court held she could not enforce the implied warranty of habitability against it.
Tacking Adverse Possession
Perry Pratt occupied a strip of land adversely for seven years then conveyed his interest to Penelope Price who continued the same use for another eight years. Because Pratt and Price were in privity the periods combined to satisfy the statutory period and Price acquired title.
Servitude Created Without Privity
Peak Performance recorded an agreement granting an online retailer permanent space on an exterior wall for parcel lockers even though the retailer held no ownership or lease interest in any parcel. Because no privity relationship is required the recorded grant created an enforceable servitude.
Assignee Bound by Lease Covenant
Global Structures leased a storage yard to Harbor Builders under a lease requiring periodic resurfacing of a shared access road. Harbor assigned the lease to Vertex Homes which took possession. Because the assignment brought Vertex into privity of estate with the landlord Vertex became obligated to perform the resurfacing covenant.
No Privity Required in Negligence
Pedro Pacheco bought a car whose brakes the manufacturer had negligently assembled. The defect caused an accident injuring a pedestrian. Because the manufacturer owes a duty of care to any foreseeable plaintiff the absence of contractual privity did not bar the pedestrian's negligence claim.
6 common questions
Students Frequently Ask...
When does a landlord remain liable after transferring the leased property?
A landlord remains liable on an express lease covenant after transfer if the obligation rests on privity of contract and the tenant has not released the landlord. Privity of estate ends with the transfer but contractual privity survives absent a release.
Supporting sources
Does a subsequent purchaser have standing to enforce an implied warranty against the original builder?
Courts are split. Some require privity of contract between the subsequent purchaser and the builder and therefore deny the claim. Others relax the privity requirement for new-home warranties.
Supporting sources
When may successive adverse possessors tack their periods of use?
Successive adverse users may add their periods to satisfy the statutory requirement only when privity exists between them. Privity is satisfied by a conveyance or other transfer of the possessory interest.
Supporting sources
Is privity required to create a servitude?
No privity relationship between the parties is necessary to create a servitude. A recorded grant may create an enforceable servitude even when the beneficiary holds no ownership or lease interest in the burdened land.
Supporting sources
When is an assignee of a lease bound by the original tenant's covenants?
An assignee is bound when the covenant touches and concerns the leased property, the original parties intended the burden to run, and the assignment brings the assignee into privity of estate with the landlord.
Supporting sources
Does lack of privity bar a negligence claim against a product manufacturer?
No. A manufacturer owes a duty of due care to any foreseeable plaintiff. Absence of contractual privity is not a defense when the product causes personal injury to a user, consumer, or bystander.
Supporting sources
privity
eliminates any such implied warranty. There is no doubt that under early common-law concepts of contractual liability, only…
Real PropertyRights in real property · Restrictive covenantsUBEIntermediate