Also known as:public trust doctrine · public-trust doctrine · PTD
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A doctrine under which the state holds title to lands flowed by tidal waters in trust for the public. The public holds rights to use those lands and waters for navigation, fishing, and recreational purposes. The doctrine persists after transfer of the land into private ownership unless proper procedures terminate the public-trust rights.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
2
Private Dock Privilege on Tidal Inlet
The Coastal Museum owns property bordering a tidal inlet designated for public fishing and boating. It records a document granting Warren a perpetual littoral access privilege to build a private dock for his gallery's commercial use. Warren sells the gallery to Gina, who continues using the dock exclusively for art shipments. The museum posts signs asserting public access. Gina sues for a declaratory judgment that she holds an enforceable private servitude, but the court holds the privilege lies outside servitude status because it is governed by the public-trust doctrine.
Coastal Development Permit Condition
The Nollans own a beachfront lot and seek a permit to replace their bungalow with a larger house. The California Coastal Commission grants the permit only on condition that the Nollans dedicate a public easement across their dry sand for beach access. The Nollans challenge the condition as an unconstitutional taking. The Court analyzes whether the condition bears an essential nexus to the public interests the Commission seeks to protect under the public-trust doctrine.
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission483 U.S. 825, 834 (1987)
The Nollans own a beachfront lot in Ventura County, California.
A concrete seawall approximately eight feet high separates the beach portion of their property from the rest of the lot. The historic mean high tide line determines the lot's oceanside boundary. The Nollans originally leased their property with an option to buy, and the building on the lot was a small bungalow totaling 504 square feet.
The Nollans' option to purchase was conditioned on their promise to demolish the bungalow and replace it. On February 25, 1982, they submitted a permit application to the California Coastal Commission proposing to demolish the existing structure and replace it with a three-bedroom house.
The Commission informed them that the permit would be granted subject to the condition that they allow the public an easement to pass across a portion of their property bounded by the mean high tide line and their seawall. On June 3, 1982, the Nollans filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus in the Ventura County Superior Court to invalidate the access condition. The court remanded the case to the Commission for a full evidentiary hearing.
After the hearing, the Commission reaffirmed the condition. The Superior Court ruled in favor of the Nollans on statutory grounds and directed that the permit condition be struck. While the Commission's appeal to the California Court of Appeal was pending, the Nollans tore down the bungalow, built the new house, and bought the property. The Court of Appeal reversed the Superior Court. The Nollans appealed to this Court, raising only the constitutional question.
Does the public-trust doctrine create servitudes that run with land?
No. Rights determined by the public-trust doctrine are excluded from the definition of servitudes. Private parties cannot convert public-trust rights into enforceable private interests through recorded agreements or deeds.
Supporting sources
What uses does the public-trust doctrine protect?
The doctrine protects public rights to use tidal lands and waters for navigation, fishing, and recreational purposes such as bathing and sunbathing. These rights persist in beach areas even after the land passes into private ownership.
Supporting sources
Can a recorded private grant override public-trust rights in tidal lands?
No. A recorded document purporting to grant a perpetual private littoral privilege on public-trust land cannot create an enforceable servitude. The public-trust doctrine categorically excludes such rights from servitude status regardless of the parties' intent or recording.
Supporting sources
How does the public-trust doctrine interact with prior-appropriation water rights?
Rights determined by prior-appropriation or ground-water doctrines receive the same exclusion from servitude status as public-trust rights. Private agreements attempting to recharacterize those rights as running covenants cannot create enforceable servitudes.
Supporting sources
483 U.S. 825, 834 (1987)
…dissent. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, dissenting. I do not understand the Court's opinion in this case to implicate in any way the public-trust doctrine. The Court certainly had no reason to address the issue, for the Court of Appeal of California did not rest its decision on Art. X, § 4, of the California Constitution. Nor did the parties…