Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A phrase denoting the intention or motive with which an act is performed. Courts examine the actor's purpose or state of mind to determine whether a required mental element such as express malice, fraudulent intent, or intent to create a property interest has been satisfied.
Sources & Authorities· 40 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Common Law
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Deliberate Shooting Shows Express Malice
Quade Quincy aims a loaded pistol at his rival and fires at close range, striking a fatal blow. The prosecution proves the shooting was not accidental or in self-defense. The court finds that Quade acted with the deliberate intent to kill, satisfying the express-malice requirement for murder.
Independent Promise Survives Merger
Quincy Quan sells land to Quiana Quach and orally promises to build a boundary fence on his retained parcel. The deed contains no mention of the fence. After closing, Quiana sues to enforce the promise. The court examines the parties' intent and holds that the fence promise was independent of the conveyance and therefore survives merger.
Fraud Claim Pleaded With Particularity
Queen Quintero alleges that Quiana Qualls knowingly misrepresented the condition of a business she sold. The complaint details the exact false statements, dates, and Quiana's knowledge that they were false. Because intent may be alleged generally, the pleading satisfies Rule 9(b) and proceeds to discovery.
Prior Act Admitted To Show Intent
Quinlan Quezada is charged with arson of a warehouse. The government offers evidence that two years earlier he set fire to a different building owned by the same insurer. The court admits the prior act under Rule 404(b)(2) because it is offered to prove intent rather than character.
Deed Creates Servitude By Implication
Quinn Industries conveys a parcel to Quorum Partners while retaining an adjacent lot. The deed grants Quorum Partners a right of way across the retained land. The court finds that the language and surrounding circumstances manifest Quinn Industries' intent to create a servitude even without an express declaration.
Intent To Cause Harm Established
Quokka Apparel's plant manager orders workers to dump toxic waste near a residential area despite knowing the likely health effects. Residents suffer injuries. The court holds that the manager's belief that harm was substantially certain to result satisfies the Restatement definition of intent for battery and trespass claims.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
How does quo animo differ from the act itself in criminal law?+
Quo animo focuses on the mental state accompanying the act. In homicide, for example, the same physical act of killing can be murder, manslaughter, or excusable depending on whether the actor possessed express malice, implied malice, or no culpable intent.
Supporting sources
When may intent be pleaded generally rather than with particularity?+
Under Rule 9(b), the circumstances of fraud or mistake must be stated with particularity, but malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of mind may be alleged generally. This distinction allows plaintiffs to survive dismissal while still providing fair notice of the factual basis for the claim.
What role does quo animo play in determining whether evidence of other acts is admissible?+
Evidence of other crimes or wrongs is inadmissible to prove character, but it may be admitted when offered for a non-propensity purpose such as proving intent. The court must then weigh the probative value of the evidence on the intent issue against the danger of unfair prejudice.
How is intent to create a servitude established under the Restatement?+
The intent to create a servitude may be express or implied. No particular form of expression is required. Courts look to the language of the instrument and the surrounding circumstances to determine whether the parties manifested the necessary purpose.
What does the Restatement mean by intent in tort law?+
Intent exists when the actor desires to cause the consequences of the act or believes those consequences are substantially certain to result. This definition applies uniformly to intentional torts such as battery, trespass, and conversion.
Secured TransactionsGeneral UCC principles · Rules of construction and application (§ 1-101, et seq.)UBEFoundational