Also known as: rational relationship test · rational relationship scrutiny · rational basis test · rational basis review · rational basis scrutiny
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard of judicial review under which a classification or regulation is upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest. Courts apply heavy deference to legislative judgments and sustain laws even when they are underinclusive or overinclusive. The standard governs equal protection and due process challenges that do not involve suspect classifications or fundamental rights.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
The state requires all police officers to retire at age fifty. Roger Ramirez, a fifty-one-year-old officer who passes every physical test, sues claiming the rule is arbitrary. The court upholds the statute because the age cutoff advances the legitimate goal of maintaining a physically capable force and need only be rationally related to that objective.
The President issues an order barring entry of pilots from several majority-Muslim countries after intelligence reports flag heightened hijacking risks. Rina Rahman, a foreign national denied training, challenges the order on Establishment Clause grounds. The court sustains the order because it states a national-security purpose and the restriction is rationally related to that purpose.
A state funds public schools primarily through local property taxes, producing large disparities between wealthy and poor districts. Roland Rhodes, a student in a low-wealth district, sues alleging equal protection violations. The court applies rational basis review and upholds the system because local control of education is a legitimate interest and the funding method is rationally related to that interest.
A state imposes higher taxes on out-of-state insurance companies than on domestic insurers. Reliance Insurance, an out-of-state carrier, challenges the tax as irrational. The court upholds the statute because encouraging in-state insurance business is a legitimate purpose and the tax distinction is rationally related to that goal.
Congress creates a private damages action for victims of gender-motivated violence. Raphael Rivera, a defendant in such a suit, argues the statute exceeds federal power. The court strikes down the provision because gender-based violence lacks a sufficient connection to interstate commerce and the remedy fails even rational basis review in that context.
Congress attempts to authorize private damages suits against states for age discrimination in employment. Rebecca Ross, a state employee denied recovery, challenges the statute's validity. The court holds that age classifications receive only rational basis review and that Congress lacked authority under Section Five to impose such liability on states.
The rational relationship standard applies to classifications that are neither suspect nor quasi-suspect and that do not burden fundamental rights. Age, disability, and most economic or social distinctions receive this deferential review. Federal alienage classifications in immigration and benefits contexts also receive at most rational basis review.
Courts give substantial deference and will uphold a law if any reasonably conceivable set of facts supports it. Laws may be underinclusive or overinclusive without failing the test. Administrative convenience and anti-fraud goals can justify classifications that are not perfectly tailored.
…the ground that "[t]he crafting and safeguarding of public morality . . . indisputably is a legitimate government interest under rational basis scrutiny"); Milner v. Apfel , 148 F. 3d 812, 814 (CA7 1998) (citing Bowers for the proposition that "[l]egislatures are permitted to legislate with regard to morality . . . rather than confined…
…turns on commercial character, the Court gestures toward two other considerations that it might sometime entertain in applying rational basis scrutiny (apart from a statutory obligation to supply independent proof of a jurisdictional element): does the congressional statute deal with subjects of traditional state regulation, and does the…
…and reach of its holding. Further, The Chief Justice admits that he would overrule the central holding of Roe and adopt the rational relationship test
…of unconstitutional grounds. Pp. 30–32. (d) On the few occasions where the Court has struck down a policy as illegitimate under rational basis scrutiny, a common thread has been that the laws at issue were “divorced from any factual context from which [the Court] could discern a
No. When the measure states a legitimate purpose on its face and is rationally related to that purpose, stray statements suggesting animus do not defeat the classification. The inquiry focuses on the stated objective and the rational connection rather than on extrinsic evidence of motive.
No. When the underlying classification receives only rational basis review, Congress must identify a pattern of unconstitutional state conduct and craft a congruent and proportional remedy. Statutes that prohibit far more constitutional conduct than unconstitutional conduct exceed Section Five authority.