Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A regulation or principle that governs conduct, procedure, or legal practice. It may arise from statutes, court decisions, constitutional provisions, or administrative statements and binds parties subject to its terms.
Sources & Authorities· 40 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Conspiracy Merger After Completed Offense
Rebecca Ross and Roland Rhodes agreed to commit arson and carried out the plan by setting fire to a warehouse. After they were convicted of arson, the prosecution sought a separate conspiracy conviction based on the same agreement. The court applied the merger rule and refused the additional conviction because the substantive offense had been completed.
Risk of Loss Under Equitable Conversion
Ruby Rivera contracted to buy a home from Ronald Reed. Before closing, a storm destroyed the garage. Rivera demanded to rescind the contract and recover her deposit. The court held that risk had passed to Rivera at contract formation, so she remained obligated to complete the purchase.
Jury Trial Right in Common Law Suit
Renata Russo sued Reliance Insurance in federal court for breach of an insurance contract seeking $75,000 in damages. Reliance moved to strike the jury demand. The court denied the motion because the suit was at common law and the amount in controversy exceeded twenty dollars.
Request to Waive Service of Summons
Rina Rahman filed suit against Regal Apparel and sent a notice requesting waiver of service. Regal Apparel ignored the request and forced the marshal to serve the summons at additional cost. The court ordered Regal Apparel to pay the extra expenses of service.
Defendant Offering Victim Trait Evidence
Riverstone Manufacturing was charged with assault. It offered evidence that the alleged victim had a reputation for violence. The prosecutor then introduced evidence of the victim's peaceful character. The court admitted the prosecution evidence because the defendant had opened the door under the rule.
Judge Prohibited From Practicing Law
A sitting judge agreed to draft a will for a neighbor for a fee. The neighbor later challenged the will on the ground that the judge had violated professional rules. The court invalidated the will because the judge was barred from practicing law while on the bench.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
6
What distinguishes a rule from an order under the Administrative Procedure Act?+
A rule is an agency statement of general or particular applicability with future effect that implements or prescribes law or policy. An order is a final disposition in a matter other than rulemaking. The distinction determines the procedures an agency must follow.
Supporting sources
When does the merger rule prevent a separate conspiracy conviction?+
Under the traditional common law rule, when conspirators complete the substantive offense that was the object of their agreement, the conspiracy merges into the completed crime. Participants may be convicted of the substantive offense but not separately for conspiracy based on the same agreement.
How does equitable conversion affect risk of loss before closing?+
Under the majority rule, risk of loss passes to the buyer at contract formation. The buyer may not avoid the contract or reduce the price if improvements are destroyed, and the seller holds legal title as trustee for the buyer.
What does the Seventh Amendment preserve regarding jury trials?+
In suits at common law where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury is preserved. No fact tried by a jury may be re-examined in any United States court except according to common law rules.
What duty does a defendant have when notified of a lawsuit under Rule 4(d)(1)?+
A defendant subject to service has a duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving the summons. The plaintiff may request waiver of service, and failure to waive without good cause may result in the defendant paying the costs of service.
When may a defendant offer evidence of a victim's pertinent trait?+
Subject to Rule 412 limitations, a defendant may offer evidence of an alleged victim's pertinent trait. If admitted, the prosecutor may then offer evidence of the victim's pertinent trait in rebuttal.
on these subjects. No decision constitutes a controlling or even a very illuminating precedent for the case before us. But a few general principles stand out in the books. An elementary…
remains in effect it has the force of law and binds the Executive Branch. The Special Prosecutor, acting within the scope of his express authority, sought specified evidence preliminarily…
Trusts and Estates Trusts and Future InterestsFuture interests · Powers of appointmentUBEFoundational