Also known as:specific findings · special finding · specific factual finding
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A particularized determination of fact or overriding interest made on the record in an individual case. Such a finding is required before a court may take certain actions that would otherwise be prohibited by constitutional or statutory rules, including closure of criminal proceedings to the public or imposition of an enhanced sentence based on additional facts.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Trial Closure Denied Without Findings
Steven Silva is tried for espionage in federal court. The district judge orders the press and public excluded from portions of the trial citing national security concerns in general terms. Because no specific finding identifies an overriding interest or explains why narrower alternatives would fail, the closure order violates the First Amendment right of access.
Zoning Ordinance Struck Down
Skylar Sullivan owns a home in East Cleveland and wishes to live with her two grandsons. The city enforces a zoning rule limiting occupancy to nuclear families. The trial court makes a specific finding that the ordinance bears no substantial relation to public health, safety, or welfare, rendering the restriction unconstitutional as applied.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio431 U.S. 494, 503 (1977)
Sentence Enhancement Requires Jury Finding
Simone Sanders is convicted of a weapons offense. The judge imposes an enhanced sentence after finding that the crime was committed with racial bias. Because the bias finding increases the statutory maximum, it must be made by a jury rather than the court alone.
Apprendi v. New Jersey530 U.S. 466 (2000)
Race-Conscious Program Reviewed
Sydney Santos, a nonminority contractor, challenges a federal set-aside program. The agency defends the program by pointing to general statistical disparities. Without a specific finding of past discrimination tied to the particular industry, the program fails strict scrutiny.
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena515 U.S. 200, 115 S.Ct. 2097, 132 L.Ed.2d 158 (Sup.Ct.1995)
Pretrial Detention Reviewed
Samuel Soto is arrested and held without a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. The state argues that its procedures satisfy due process. The court requires a specific finding, based on evidence presented at a hearing, that probable cause exists before continued detention is permitted.
Gerstein v. Pugh420 U.S. 103 (1975)
Merger Negotiations Materiality
Sophia Singh purchases stock in Basic Inc. after the company issues statements denying merger talks. Later disclosures reveal ongoing negotiations. The court rejects a bright-line rule and instead requires a specific finding on whether the undisclosed information would have been viewed by a reasonable investor as altering the total mix of information.
Basic Inc. v. Levinson485 U.S. [224], at 238 1988
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
When must a court make a specific finding rather than rely on a general rule?+
A court must make a specific finding when constitutional or statutory rules require case-by-case justification before limiting rights or deviating from presumptive outcomes. Examples include closing a criminal trial to the public or imposing an enhanced sentence based on additional facts.
Supporting sources
How does a specific finding differ from a general verdict?+
A specific finding states the particular facts or interests supporting a ruling. A general verdict simply declares which party wins without identifying the underlying determinations.
Supporting sources
What happens if a court fails to make a required specific finding?+
The action taken without the finding is invalid. For instance, a trial closure or sentence enhancement imposed without the necessary particularized determination violates the governing constitutional standard.
Supporting sources
Does a specific finding need to be written?+
The finding may be stated orally in open court or set forth in a written opinion or order, provided it is made on the record and identifies the facts or interests with particularity.
Supporting sources
431 U.S. 494, 503 (1977)Property
…welfare. " Id. , at 395 (emphasis added). This principle was applied in Nectow v. Cambridge , 277 U. S. 183; on the basis of a specific finding made by the state trial court that "the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the inhabitants of the part of the city affected" would not be promoted by prohibiting the…