Also known as:substantial government interest · important governmental interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A governmental objective sufficiently weighty to justify a regulation that incidentally burdens protected rights under intermediate scrutiny. The objective must be genuine and unrelated to suppressing expression or discriminating on suspect grounds. Courts assess whether the regulation directly advances the objective without greater restriction than necessary.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Draft Card Burning Protest
Santiago Sanchez publicly burns his draft card outside a federal building to protest the Vietnam War. The government prosecutes him under a statute aimed at preserving the selective service system. The court upholds the conviction because the statute furthers the substantial governmental interest in maintaining an effective draft without targeting speech.
Corporate Political Spending Ban
Samuel Soto, a corporate executive, seeks to fund an independent film criticizing a political candidate. A federal statute prohibits such corporate expenditures. The court strikes down the ban because it fails to advance a substantial governmental interest in preventing corruption when applied to independent speech.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission558 U.S. 310, 352 (2010)
Campaign Contribution Caps
Scott Summers donates large sums to multiple candidates in a single election cycle. Federal law caps individual contributions to prevent corruption. The court sustains the caps because they serve the substantial governmental interest in avoiding the appearance of quid pro quo influence.
Buckley v. Valeo424 U.S. 1, 93 (1976)
Zoning Restriction on Households
Sarah Sullivan and five unrelated roommates rent a home in Belle Terre. A local ordinance limits occupancy to two unrelated persons. The court upholds the ordinance because it advances the substantial governmental interest in preserving neighborhood character and family values.
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas416 U.S. 1 (1974)
Utility Advertising Prohibition
Silverline Industries, a public utility, wants to advertise electric heating to increase demand. A state commission bans promotional advertising to conserve energy. The court invalidates the ban because the prohibition does not directly advance the substantial governmental interest in fair rates when less speech-restrictive alternatives exist.
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York447 U.S. 557, 100 S. Ct. 2343, 65 L. Ed. 2d 341 (1980)
Adult Theater Zoning Ordinance
Sapphire Technologies opens an adult theater in a commercial zone near schools. City of Renton enacts an ordinance restricting such theaters to industrial areas to curb secondary effects. The court sustains the ordinance because it serves the substantial governmental interest in preserving urban quality of life while leaving open alternative sites.
City of Renton, et al. v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., et al.475 U.S. 41, 106 S. Ct. 925, 89 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1986)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What makes a governmental interest substantial rather than merely legitimate?+
A substantial governmental interest must be genuine and weighty enough to justify incidental burdens on speech or equality under intermediate scrutiny. Courts accept interests such as preserving the draft system, preventing corruption, conserving energy, or maintaining urban quality of life when supported by the record. Trivial or pretextual concerns do not qualify.
Supporting sources
How does the substantial governmental interest prong interact with the unrelated-to-suppression requirement in the O'Brien test?+
The interest must be unrelated to suppressing expression even if the regulation incidentally affects speech. In an essay fact pattern involving burning compliance certificates, the court examines whether the stated goals of record preservation and fire safety are genuine or merely a cover for targeting protest. If the interest is tied to viewpoint suppression, the regulation fails.
Supporting sources
Does a substantial governmental interest alone guarantee that a regulation survives intermediate scrutiny?+
No. The regulation must also directly advance the interest and be narrowly tailored so that the speech restriction is no greater than essential. In commercial speech cases the Court has struck down bans that fail the direct-advancement or narrow-tailoring steps even when a substantial interest like energy conservation is present.
Supporting sources
539 U.S. 558 (2003)Constitutional Law
…we concluded, in Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. , 501 U. S. 560, 569 (1991), that Indiana's public indecency statute furthered "a substantial government interest in protecting order and morality," ibid. (plurality opinion); see also id. , at 575 (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment). State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest,…