Also known as: zone · zones · zoned · land-use zoning · zoning ordinance
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A system of land-use regulation by which a municipality divides its territory into districts and restricts the uses, structures, and densities permitted within each district. The restrictions must bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare to withstand constitutional challenge. Preexisting lawful uses receive protection as nonconforming uses, and rezonings must follow statutory notice and hearing procedures while avoiding arbitrary spot zoning.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Zion Zhao and his spouse operate a small home-based business in a residential district. The city enacts a zoning rule barring all commercial activity in that zone. Zhao claims the rule invades the marital zone of privacy protected by the Constitution. The court applies heightened scrutiny and invalidates the ordinance because it arbitrarily interferes with intimate family decisions without sufficient justification.
Zoya Zafar obtains a final district court judgment upholding a variance denial. She files a notice of appeal to the court of appeals under the statute governing review of final district court decisions. The appellate court accepts jurisdiction because the order ends the litigation on the merits.
Zavier Ziegler has operated a small machine shop on his property for twenty years under prior zoning. The city rezones the area residential and seeks immediate closure. Ziegler retains the right to continue the use because it was lawful when established and the vested right protects against abrupt termination.
Zoe Zeller offers a city zoning map bearing the official seal of the municipal planning department to prove the permitted uses on her lot. The court admits the map without extrinsic authentication because it carries the seal of a political subdivision.
Zeke Zhao challenges a municipal height restriction as an invalid servitude. The court holds that public zoning regulations fall outside the definition of servitudes and are instead exercises of the police power subject to separate constitutional limits.
Zircon Resources owns land zoned for low-density residential use. The city later imposes a classification that prevents any economically viable development. The court examines whether the restriction bears a substantial relation to public welfare or instead effects an arbitrary deprivation of beneficial use.
A use that was lawful when established generally may continue despite later zoning restrictions. The owner holds a vested right that the municipality cannot eliminate immediately upon rezoning. The right may be lost only through abandonment, statutory discontinuance, or a reasonable amortization period.
Spot zoning singles out one parcel or small area for a use inconsistent with the surrounding zone and comprehensive plan. It is invalid when the change primarily benefits a particular owner rather than serving a legitimate public purpose. Rezonings must bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, or welfare.
…v. Botsford , 141 U.S. 250 (1891), the Court has recognized that a right of personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy, does exist under the Constitution. This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as…
…in court or fear of the expense of having to do so. They tend to make only statements which "steer far wider of the unlawful zone." Speiser v. Randall, supra, 357 U. S., at 526. The rule thus dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate. It is inconsistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The…
…Two separate plans, both designed by architect Marcel Breuer and both apparently satisfying the terms of the applicable zoning ordinance
…The Constitution does not explicitly mention a right of privacy, but various guarantees within the Bill of Rights create zones of privacy, and the right of marital privacy is protected within the penumbras of these guarantees. Pp. 482–485. 2. The Connecticut statute, as applied to married couples, violates the…
…constitutional scrutiny. Dissenting opinions Dissenting — Mr. Justice Stewart The Court today strikes down a local zoning ordinance that is designed to preserve the character of the city’s neighborhoods. The
The owner must demonstrate good-faith reliance on a permit or existing zoning together with substantial expenditures or a change in position. Jurisdictions differ on whether a valid permit plus substantial construction is required or whether a balancing test applies. The doctrine prevents a municipality from defeating reasonable expectations formed under prior law.
The ordinance must be reasonable and bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, morals, or general welfare. Comprehensive zoning that divides a municipality into districts and restricts uses is a valid exercise of the police power when these standards are met.