Custom practice
When you know exactly what is shaky, a generic question dump wastes the hour. Pick the concepts, pick the length, and run only what you need.
Pro
“As if it couldn't get any better.”
Trusted by Law Students Nationwide

Verifiable to the Source
Step 1 · Answered
This is a real Contracts question from our bank
Riverside Hospital sent MedPro Supplies a signed purchase order for 5,000 disposable surgical gowns. The order said nothing about indemnity or dispute resolution. MedPro mailed back its standard confirmation, repeating quantity and price but adding an indemnity clause and a requirement that disputes be arbitrated. Both are merchants. MedPro delivered the gowns, Riverside paid, and the gowns were used. Riverside later claimed a shipment was defective and filed suit in court. MedPro demanded arbitration under its confirmation form.
In Riverside's lawsuit, is a court likely to require Riverside to arbitrate its dispute with MedPro based on the arbitration clause in MedPro's confirmation form?
Correct · D
D is correct. This transaction is a sale of goods between merchants, so the battle of the forms rules apply. Riverside's signed purchase order was the offer. MedPro's confirmation was a definite expression of acceptance. It repeated the dickered terms but added indemnity and arbitration provisions. Those are "additional terms," not part of the original offer. Between merchants, additional terms can become part of the contract only if certain conditions are met. One key limitation is that an additional term will not be incorporated if it would materially alter the contract. Clauses that change how disputes are resolved, such as mandatory arbitration provisions and broad indemnity requirements, often have significant practical and legal consequences. Courts frequently treat them as material alterations because they surprise or substantially shift risk. Here, the parties formed a contract for gowns based on the matching terms of the order and confirmation, and they performed under that contract. The arbitration clause was only a proposal for an added term. Because it is the kind of term that may materially alter the bargain, a court is unlikely to treat it as having silently become part of the contract. Riverside therefore cannot be compelled to arbitrate based solely on MedPro's boilerplate.
Rule tested
UCC § 2-207(2)
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
Related authority
UCC § 2-207(1)
A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
UCC § 2-207(2)(b)
they materially alter it; or
UCC § 2-207(3)
Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.
What you actually get
See for yourself
Choose the exam, choose the concepts, choose how many questions. This is the same builder you use inside the product — the only thing missing is your own attempt history filtering the pool.
Choose the exam, concepts, and length — same builder, live.
Selection
Walk the outline tree and check the exact concepts you want on the set — Contracts formation next to Evidence hearsay if that is what tomorrow covers. Each node shows how many questions are available before you commit, so you never build a set that comes up empty.
Filters
The builder filters against your own attempt history, so a set can be nothing but questions you missed, or nothing but questions you have never seen. That is the difference between reviewing and re-reading.
Shape of the set
Pick Law School or Bar Exam difficulty and a question count that fits the gap in your day. A focused twelve-question set before class is a real study session; a ninety-question slog you abandon is not.
How you review
See the reasoning immediately after each answer while you are learning a rule, or hold everything until the end when you are simulating a graded set. Same questions, two very different exercises.
Sessions
Sessions save as you go, so an interrupted set is still there when you come back, and the completed set stays reviewable afterward instead of disappearing once you close the tab.
Same standard
A custom set is not a lesser pool. Every question carries per-option explanations, its trap tagging, and the rule it tests — and correct answers still earn study points the first time.
Mix concepts from as many of these subjects as you want in a single set — a Contracts and Evidence quiz is one selection away.
Common questions
Why trust this
We do not publish score or pass-rate claims. We have not run an outcomes study, and we will not imply results we have not measured.
Attorney-built study paths for every major subject, with practice attached at each step.
Guided path free on Basic. Unlimited practice on Pro.
Accuracy and mastery down to the concept, plus the wrong-answer patterns costing you points.
A complete log of every session, essay, and task, linked back to the original work.
Free on Basic