Analytics
See the broad brush strokes of your performance in seconds — enough to spot the major gaps worth your time — then drill down concept by concept until every data point tells you precisely where to focus.
“I stopped guessing what to study next.”
Trusted by Law Students Nationwide

Verifiable to the Source
Step 1 · Answered
This is a real Contracts question from our bank
Riverside Hospital sent MedPro Supplies a signed purchase order for 5,000 disposable surgical gowns. The order said nothing about indemnity or dispute resolution. MedPro mailed back its standard confirmation, repeating quantity and price but adding an indemnity clause and a requirement that disputes be arbitrated. Both are merchants. MedPro delivered the gowns, Riverside paid, and the gowns were used. Riverside later claimed a shipment was defective and filed suit in court. MedPro demanded arbitration under its confirmation form.
In Riverside's lawsuit, is a court likely to require Riverside to arbitrate its dispute with MedPro based on the arbitration clause in MedPro's confirmation form?
Correct · D
D is correct. This transaction is a sale of goods between merchants, so the battle of the forms rules apply. Riverside's signed purchase order was the offer. MedPro's confirmation was a definite expression of acceptance. It repeated the dickered terms but added indemnity and arbitration provisions. Those are "additional terms," not part of the original offer. Between merchants, additional terms can become part of the contract only if certain conditions are met. One key limitation is that an additional term will not be incorporated if it would materially alter the contract. Clauses that change how disputes are resolved, such as mandatory arbitration provisions and broad indemnity requirements, often have significant practical and legal consequences. Courts frequently treat them as material alterations because they surprise or substantially shift risk. Here, the parties formed a contract for gowns based on the matching terms of the order and confirmation, and they performed under that contract. The arbitration clause was only a proposal for an added term. Because it is the kind of term that may materially alter the bargain, a court is unlikely to treat it as having silently become part of the contract. Riverside therefore cannot be compelled to arbitrate based solely on MedPro's boilerplate.
Rule tested
UCC § 2-207(2)
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
Related authority
UCC § 2-207(1)
A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
UCC § 2-207(2)(b)
they materially alter it; or
UCC § 2-207(3)
Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.
What you actually get
See for yourself
Top-line numbers, then a concept-by-concept breakdown, then the error patterns behind the misses. Expand a course and see how far down it goes.
Expand a course and see accuracy, volume, and the error patterns behind the misses.
Your performance
Completion
69 of 111 questions
Accuracy
51 correct answers
Day streak
Practiced 6 of last 7 days
By concept
Expand any row for correct counts, citations tested, and where the misses cluster.
Top error patterns
Expand to see why the pattern keeps showing up — and which recent misses fit it.
At a glance
Completion, accuracy, attempts, and average time per question sit at the top, so ten seconds tells you whether the last week worked. Then you go looking for why.
On the header
Depth
Expand a course into its outline and see attempted, correct, accuracy, citations tested, and last studied for every node — then open a concept to page through the individual questions and your history on each. Subject-level averages hide exactly the gaps you need.
Error patterns
Wrong answers are grouped by the trap type each distractor was built from and ranked by how often you fall for it, with the questions behind every pattern one click away. "Sixty-eight percent in Evidence" is not actionable; "you keep picking the partial truth" is.
What is done
Once a concept has enough attempts and your accuracy on it clears the threshold, it moves into your success patterns. Re-reviewing what is already solid is the most comfortable way to waste a study week.
Momentum
Consecutive days, longest streak, and total days studied sit beside your results, because consistency is the variable most students can actually control. No separate habit app required.
Over time
See time studied and work completed over ranges from seven days out to a full year, broken out by multiple choice, essays, and performance tasks — so written work is visible rather than invisible next to question counts.
Filters
Filter the whole picture to Law School or Bar Exam difficulty so strong performance at one level does not disguise weak performance at the other. They are different exams asking different things.
Exam history
Practice exam results appear here with their section scores, so a full sitting becomes a datapoint in the trend instead of a one-off number you wrote down somewhere.
Put to work
Your weak topics and recurring trap types feed the study companion, so when you ask what to work on tonight the answer comes from your record rather than from generic exam advice.
Common questions
Why trust this
We do not publish score or pass-rate claims. We have not run an outcomes study, and we will not imply results we have not measured.
Attorney-built study paths for every major subject, with practice attached at each step.
Guided path free on Basic. Unlimited practice on Pro.
Attorney-written questions for every rule, with per-option explanations and rule citations.
A complete log of every session, essay, and task, linked back to the original work.
Free on Basic