Socrates
Meet Socrates®
Socrates is your powerful study companion every step toward becoming a lawyer. Unlike GPT, Claude, and other chatbots, Socrates doesn't invent material — everything it says is grounded in truthful cases and cited to the same sources you'll be citing on exams and when you practice law. Oh… and it scored a 95% on the bar exam!
Included on Basic with a monthly budget. Much larger budget on Pro.
“It's literally 1000x better than any professor or lawyer… how is this even legal??”
Trusted by Law Students Nationwide
Verifiable to the Source
Not AI slop. Prepared by attorneys.
Step 1 · Answered
This is a real Contracts question from our bank
Riverside Hospital sent MedPro Supplies a signed purchase order for 5,000 disposable surgical gowns. The order said nothing about indemnity or dispute resolution. MedPro mailed back its standard confirmation, repeating quantity and price but adding an indemnity clause and a requirement that disputes be arbitrated. Both are merchants. MedPro delivered the gowns, Riverside paid, and the gowns were used. Riverside later claimed a shipment was defective and filed suit in court. MedPro demanded arbitration under its confirmation form.
In Riverside's lawsuit, is a court likely to require Riverside to arbitrate its dispute with MedPro based on the arbitration clause in MedPro's confirmation form?
- AYes, because arbitration clauses are always enforceable to promote efficient dispute resolution.
- BYes, because additional written terms automatically become part of every sale-of-goods contract.
- CNo, because Riverside's purchase order expressly rejected all additional boilerplate terms.
- DNo, because the arbitration clause is an additional term that may materially alter.
Correct · D
D is correct. This transaction is a sale of goods between merchants, so the battle of the forms rules apply. Riverside's signed purchase order was the offer. MedPro's confirmation was a definite expression of acceptance. It repeated the dickered terms but added indemnity and arbitration provisions. Those are "additional terms," not part of the original offer. Between merchants, additional terms can become part of the contract only if certain conditions are met. One key limitation is that an additional term will not be incorporated if it would materially alter the contract. Clauses that change how disputes are resolved, such as mandatory arbitration provisions and broad indemnity requirements, often have significant practical and legal consequences. Courts frequently treat them as material alterations because they surprise or substantially shift risk. Here, the parties formed a contract for gowns based on the matching terms of the order and confirmation, and they performed under that contract. The arbitration clause was only a proposal for an added term. Because it is the kind of term that may materially alter the bargain, a court is unlikely to treat it as having silently become part of the contract. Riverside therefore cannot be compelled to arbitrate based solely on MedPro's boilerplate.
Rule tested
UCC § 2-207(2)
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
Related authority
UCC § 2-207(1)
A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
UCC § 2-207(2)(b)
they materially alter it; or
UCC § 2-207(3)
Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.
What you actually get
Every part of Socrates, in detail.
See for yourself
Read an answer with its citations attached.
This is a real Socrates answer. Look at the end of it: numbered endnotes pointing at the authority each claim came from. That is the difference between a study companion and a chatbot that sounds confident.
Read an answer that cites its sources
Follow the numbered endnotes — every claim points back to authority in our library.
Socrates
Your study companion for outlining, hypos, and exam prep — grounded in real citations, cases, and dictionary entries. Tap a citation to read the rule text.
I'm outlining landowner duties for my Torts midterm. If a shopkeeper saw ice at the entrance and opened without salting or warning, what's the duty analysis for an invitee?
Grounding
It answers from our library, not from the open web.
General chatbots generate plausible law and invent case names to support it. Socrates retrieves from four sources we own and control, and it answers from what it retrieved — so the material behind an answer is material an attorney wrote or a court published.
What it retrieves from
- The citation rule bank
- Full case opinions
- The legal dictionary
- Secondary sources and treatises
Citations
Every answer carries endnotes you can open.
Answers end with numbered citations, and rule, case, and term references become clickable chips that open the underlying text. You are never asked to take its word for anything — which is the only defensible way to use AI for law.
Context
It already knows what you are looking at.
Ask a question from a case, a quiz review, an essay, or your performance page and Socrates picks that context up automatically. You do not re-explain the hypothetical or paste the question in — you just ask.
Places it knows you are
- A case opinion
- A course reading
- A quiz in progress
- A quiz review
- An essay you are writing
- An essay review
- A practice exam
- A dictionary entry
- Your performance page
…and more, tracked the same way.
Your data
It knows where you are weak.
Your accuracy, your weakest topics, the trap types you keep falling for, and your recent scores inform its answers. Study advice that ignores your actual record is just generic advice with your name on it.
Grading
It grades your written work against the real rubrics.
Socrates is what scores your essays on the ten-point analysis rubric and your performance tasks on all twenty-four NCBE subpoints. The same grounding rules apply, so feedback points at the rule you missed rather than at a vibe.
Your library
Bring your own outlines, syllabi, and readings.
Upload your own materials into a personal library, organize them in folders, and attach them to a conversation — so your professor's emphasis and your own notes are part of the answer instead of being ignored.
Continuity
Conversations and projects that survive the semester.
Threads are saved and titled automatically and can be grouped into projects, so a semester of questions stays organized instead of scrolling away into a single endless chat.
Access
Included on the free plan, much larger on Pro.
Every account gets a monthly Socrates budget, including free accounts, and Pro raises it substantially. The same budget covers asking questions and having your written work graded.
Common questions
Socrates, answered
Is Socrates just ChatGPT for law school?
Does Socrates cite its sources?
Is Socrates included for free?
Can Socrates grade my essay or performance task?
Why trust this
How Socrates holds up
- Answers are retrieved from our own attorney-written library and primary authority, not the open web.
- Every answer carries citations you can open and check.
- It shows its sources instead of asserting, which is the whole point of using it for law.
- Used by law students at schools across the country
- Used by candidates preparing for the bar exam
- Used by attorneys who studied with it before admission
- Recommended by practicing attorneys
We do not publish score or pass-rate claims. We have not run an outcomes study, and we will not imply results we have not measured.
Pairs with
Case Library
Full opinions plus expert analysis, with citations that jump to the supporting passage.
Free on Basic. No account needed to read.
Legal Dictionary
Terms defined with sourced authorities, examples, and the cases that use them.
Free, no account needed
Concept Readings
Clear written explanations of every concept, with cited rules and comprehension checks inline.
Free to read, no account needed. Answering checks requires a free account.