Also known as: disability benefit
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Government-provided payments to individuals unable to work due to physical or mental impairment. These benefits qualify as a protected property interest when conferred by statute or regulation, triggering procedural due process requirements for termination decisions.
Dominic Drake received Social Security disability benefits for several years after a back injury. The agency reviewed his medical records, concluded his condition had improved, and mailed written notice proposing termination along with an opportunity to submit a written response. Drake submitted documents but received no live hearing until months later. The post-termination hearing with possible retroactive payments satisfied due process.
Elena Foster received state disability benefits after a workplace injury. The agency proposed ending payments based on updated medical evidence and sent written notice offering a chance to reply in writing. Foster submitted additional physician statements. A later evidentiary hearing with possible retroactive restoration satisfied due process.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Marcus Hale obtained federal disability benefits following a serious illness. After a routine review the agency mailed notice of proposed termination and invited written medical documentation. Hale provided new test results. The subsequent full hearing with retroactive payments met constitutional requirements.
Nora Ives collected disability benefits for a chronic condition. The agency terminated payments after an internal file review and gave written notice plus a chance for written rebuttal. Ives later received a live hearing that could award back benefits. This sequence satisfied due process.
Oscar Jensen received disability benefits after an accident. The agency proposed ending them and supplied written notice with an opportunity to respond in writing. A later evidentiary hearing allowing retroactive payments was upheld after weighing private interests against administrative costs.
Paula Klein obtained disability benefits for a mental-health impairment. The agency reviewed records, proposed termination, and mailed notice inviting written evidence. Klein responded. A subsequent hearing with possible back payments satisfied the balancing test for due process.
Written notice and an opportunity to respond in writing before termination, followed by a full evidentiary hearing with retroactive benefits if the claimant prevails, satisfy due process. The Mathews balancing test weighs the private interest, risk of erroneous deprivation, value of additional safeguards, and the government's administrative and fiscal interests.
Supporting sources
Yes. Disability benefits conferred by statute or regulation create a legitimate claim of entitlement that constitutes property under the Due Process Clause. Courts have recognized such interests in Social Security disability benefits and similar state-conferred programs.
Supporting sources
The Act preempts state community property laws that would allow a nonemployee spouse to transfer an interest in the employee spouse's retirement or disability benefits by will. Congress did not intend to permit such transfers through testamentary instruments.
Supporting sources
…BRENNAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined. Syllabus The respondent was awarded Social Security disability benefits in 1968. In March 1972, he received a questionnaire from the state agency charged with monitoring his medical condition. After he returned the questionnaire, the agency requested additional…