Also known as: distinctions · distinguish · distinguished · distinguishing · distinguishing precedent
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A legal differentiation between categories of persons, conduct, or things that carries distinct legal consequences. The line drawn determines which standard of review, procedural rule, or liability theory applies to each category.
Dominic Drake, a 51-year-old officer still passing all fitness tests, challenges the city's rule ending employment at age 50. The court applies rational basis review because age receives no suspect classification. The distinction between age and immutable traits like race means the rule survives as long as it rationally advances a legitimate goal of maintaining physical readiness.
Dover Bank amends its articles to authorize two series of preferred stock. One series carries cumulative dividends and voting rights while the other does not. The statute requires a distinguishing designation and full description of each series before issuance so that identical shares within a series receive identical treatment.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Danielle Dixon, a private citizen, sues a newspaper for a false report about her business practices. Because she is not a public figure, she need not prove actual malice. The distinction between private and public plaintiffs allows the state to impose liability on a negligence standard while still barring presumed damages absent actual malice.
Dominion Capital attacks a campaign-finance statute both on its face and as applied to its own advertisements. The court notes that the facial-as-applied distinction affects only the breadth of the remedy, not whether the constitutional claim itself may be raised.
Dorothy Daniels, a grandmother, seeks to live with her son's children in a single-family zone. The ordinance permits a grandmother to reside with her daughter's children but not her son's. The court holds the distinction between maternal and paternal lines irrational and therefore unconstitutional.
Diana Delgado faces delinquency charges and the state seeks to prove the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. The court rejects the civil-criminal distinction as a reason to relax due-process protections, requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
A distinction triggers heightened scrutiny only when it classifies on the basis of a suspect or quasi-suspect trait such as race or gender. Age-based lines receive only rational-basis review because age is not a suspect classification.
Supporting sources
The statute requires a distinguishing designation and a description of terms so that shares within the same class or series receive identical preferences, rights, and limitations.
Supporting sources
Private plaintiffs may recover under a fault standard chosen by the state and need not prove actual malice, but they still may not obtain presumed or punitive damages without that showing.
Supporting sources
No. The distinction concerns only the breadth of the remedy a court may award, not whether the claim itself may be asserted.
Supporting sources
…or attempted by medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother," sweeps too broadly. The statute makes no distinction between abortions performed early in pregnancy and those performed later, and it limits to a single reason, "saving the life of the mother," the legal justification for the procedure. The…