Also known as:first degree felony murder · first-degree felony-murder · felony murder · first-degree murder
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A form of murder in which malice aforethought is supplied by the defendant's intent to commit a qualifying felony during whose commission or attempted commission the death occurs. The rule converts the intent to commit the underlying felony into the malice required for murder liability.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
6
Robbery During Escape
Felicia Fuentes entered a convenience store intending to rob the register. She pointed a gun at the clerk and demanded cash. When the clerk resisted, Fuentes fired once, killing him. The death occurred while Fuentes was carrying out the robbery, supplying the malice for first-degree felony murder.
Burglary Turned Fatal
Felipe Figueroa broke into a residence at night to steal electronics. The homeowner awoke and confronted him. Figueroa struck the homeowner with a lamp, causing fatal head injuries. The death occurred during commission of the qualifying felony of burglary, supporting first-degree felony murder liability.
Frederick Ferguson conducted an armed robbery of a store. When a colleague confronted him about the illegal activity, Ferguson shoved the colleague into a glass partition. The colleague suffered fatal lacerations. The death was a foreseeable consequence of the ongoing qualifying felony, supporting first-degree felony murder liability.
Life Sentence Challenge
Felicity French participated in an armed robbery during which her accomplice killed a clerk. French did not fire the fatal shot or intend lethal force. She received a mandatory life sentence without parole. The sentence raised proportionality questions under the Eighth Amendment.
Harmelin v. Michigan501 U.S. 957, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991)
Ronald Harmelin was convicted in Michigan state court of possessing 672 grams of cocaine.
Michigan law imposed a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole for that quantity of the drug. Harmelin had no prior felony convictions.
The Michigan Court of Appeals initially reversed the conviction because evidence supporting it had been obtained in violation of the Michigan Constitution. On petition for rehearing, the Court of Appeals vacated its prior decision and affirmed the sentence. The Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal.
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. The quantity of cocaine at issue had a potential yield of between 32,500 and 65,000 doses. The sentencing court imposed the mandatory term without considering any individualized circumstances of the offense or the offender.
Harmelin challenged the sentence on Eighth Amendment grounds, arguing both that it was grossly disproportionate to the crime and that the mandatory nature of the penalty was unconstitutional.
Freya Freeman was convicted of first-degree murder after a death occurred during a burglary. State law required the death penalty upon conviction without considering mitigating factors. The automatic imposition violated the requirement of individualized sentencing.
Woodson v. North Carolina428 U.S. 280, 96 S.Ct. 2978, 49 L.Ed.2d 944 (1976)
James Tyrone Woodson and Luby Waxton were convicted of first-degree murder following their participation in an armed robbery of a convenience food store on June 3, 1974, during which the cashier was killed and a customer was seriously wounded. There were four participants in the robbery: Woodson, Waxton, Leonard Tucker, and Johnnie Lee Carroll. Tucker and Carroll testified for the prosecution after pleading guilty to lesser offenses, while the petitioners testified in their own defense.
The prosecution established that the men had discussed the robbery for some time. On the day of the crime, Waxton struck Woodson to sober him up after heavy drinking, and the group armed themselves before proceeding to the store. Tucker and Waxton entered the store, where Waxton shot the cashier at point-blank range and took the money tray, with a second shot fired before they fled. The petitioners' testimony largely agreed with this account except that Waxton claimed Tucker had done the shooting.
The petitioners were found guilty on all charges and, as required by North Carolina's mandatory death penalty statute for first-degree murder, were sentenced to death. The statute had been enacted after the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. Waddell severed the discretionary provision from the prior law in response to Furman v. Georgia. The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the convictions and death sentences in State v. Woodson, 287 N. C. 578, 215 S. E. 2d 607 (1975).
The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari to consider whether the imposition of the death penalties comported with the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Fiona Foster drove the getaway car during a rape that ended in the victim's death. Foster did not personally kill or intend that lethal force be used. The death penalty could not be imposed on her under Eighth Amendment proportionality standards.
Coker v. Georgia433 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977)
Ehrlich Anthony Coker was serving consecutive life sentences for murder, rape, kidnapping, and aggravated assault when he escaped from the Ware Correctional Institution near Waycross, Georgia, on September 2, 1974. Later that night, Coker entered the home of Allen and Elnita Carver through an unlocked kitchen door. He tied up Mr. Carver in the bathroom, took a knife from the kitchen along with money and car keys, raped the sixteen-year-old Mrs. Carver, and abducted her in the family car while threatening her husband.
Coker was soon apprehended by police after the abduction. He faced charges of escape, armed robbery, motor vehicle theft, kidnapping, and rape in the Superior Court of Cobb County, Georgia. Following a determination that he was competent to stand trial, a jury convicted Coker on all counts after rejecting his plea of insanity. At the sentencing hearing, the jury found two aggravating circumstances and imposed the death penalty for the rape conviction.
The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Coker's convictions and the death sentence imposed for rape. The United States Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to consider whether the death penalty for rape of an adult woman violates the Eighth Amendment.
What mental state satisfies malice for felony murder at common law?
An intent to commit a qualifying felony supplies the malice aforethought required for murder. The death must occur during the commission or attempted commission of that felony.
Supporting sources
When does a death during a felony support only manslaughter instead of murder?
If the felony does not qualify for felony murder treatment and the death is a foreseeable consequence of the felony, the killing constitutes at least involuntary manslaughter.
Supporting sources
Does the felony murder rule apply when the underlying felony is the act causing death itself?
Some jurisdictions limit the rule through a merger doctrine so that felonies like assault or robbery that are included in the homicide do not independently support felony murder.
Can an accomplice who did not kill receive the death penalty for felony murder?
The death penalty may not be imposed on an accomplice who did not kill, attempt to kill, or intend lethal force unless the accomplice was a major participant acting with reckless indifference to human life.
Supporting sources
466 U.S. 668 (1984)
…had also confessed to the first two murders. By the date set for trial, respondent was subject to indictment for three counts of first-degree murder and multiple counts of robbery, kidnaping for ransom, breaking and entering and assault, attempted murder, and conspiracy to commit robbery. Respondent waived his right to a jury trial,…