Also known as:general intent · specific intent · mens rea · criminal intent
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A distinction in criminal law between the mental state needed for most offenses and the heightened mental state required for certain inchoate or property crimes. General intent requires only the purposeful performance of the prohibited act. Specific intent requires an additional purpose to achieve a particular result or consequence beyond commission of the act itself.
Sources & Authorities· 9 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Uniform Acts
Common Law
Restatements
Course Outlines
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Conspiracy Agreement Forms Without Overt Act
Gerald Gibson and Gwen Gallagher meet in a warehouse and agree to burn a rival's storage shed to eliminate competition. They shake hands on the plan but take no further steps before arrest. The agreement itself completes the conspiracy because both parties formed the specific intent to achieve the unlawful objective of arson.
Feigned Agreement Prevents Conspiracy
Genevieve Gardner proposes to Gregory Gates that they embezzle client funds from their law firm by altering disbursement sheets. Gregory nods and shakes hands but secretly intends only to gather evidence for authorities and never shares the purpose of permanent deprivation. No conspiracy forms because Gregory lacks genuine specific intent to accomplish the criminal objective.
Solicitation Requires Purpose to Commit Crime
Gina Griffin approaches Gary Goldman at a music festival and offers cash plus detailed instructions on how to assault a critic so security will eject him before a review. Gina's statements show specific intent that Gary actually commit the assault rather than mere general approval of the idea. The solicitation offense is complete upon the request regardless of Gary's response.
Sanity Bears on Capacity for Malice
Gulfstream Aviation's maintenance chief, after a psychotic episode, sets fire to an empty hangar believing it will protect company secrets. The prosecution must prove he possessed the general intent to perform the act of ignition coupled with malice. Evidence of insanity negates the vicious will required for arson liability.
Davis v. United States160 U.S. 469, 16 S.Ct. 353, 40 L.Ed. 499 (1895)
Co-Conspirator Liability Follows Specific Intent
Gateway Bank officers agree that one will falsify loan records to conceal embezzlement while the other handles the proceeds. Under Pinkerton, each is liable for the foreseeable crimes of the other because both entered the agreement with the specific intent that the criminal objective be accomplished.
Pinkerton v. United States328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489
Morrissette Clarifies Specific Intent Element
Genesis Pharmaceuticals employees remove surplus medical samples from a warehouse intending only to discard them as waste. When charged with conversion, the government must prove they acted with the specific intent to permanently deprive the owner rather than mere general intent to handle the property.
Morrissette v. United States342 U.S. 246, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L.Ed. 288.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
What is the difference between general intent and specific intent?+
General intent requires only that the defendant purposefully perform the prohibited act. Specific intent requires an additional purpose to achieve a particular result or consequence beyond the act itself, such as the intent to permanently deprive in larceny or the intent that the solicited person actually commit the crime.
Supporting sources
Does common law arson require specific intent to burn a dwelling?+
No. Common law arson requires only malice, which is satisfied by intent to burn, knowledge that the structure will burn, or conscious disregard of an obvious and substantial risk that it will burn. Specific intent to burn the dwelling is not required, and accidental burning from negligence does not suffice.
How does specific intent function in common law solicitation?+
Solicitation requires that the defendant incite or urge another to commit a crime while acting with the specific intent that the solicited person actually commit the crime. Mere general approval of the conduct does not satisfy the mental element, and the offense is complete upon the solicitation itself.
Supporting sources
Why does the Model Penal Code reject the general-specific intent distinction?+
The distinction is ambiguous and leads to inconsistent application. The MPC replaces it with four precise culpability categories: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently, which provide clearer analytical tools for determining fault elements.
Supporting sources
Can one party to an alleged conspiracy lack specific intent and still create liability for the other?+
No. Under the common law bilateral rule, both parties must genuinely share the specific intent to accomplish the same criminal objective. If one merely pretends to agree or lacks the requisite intent, no conspiracy arises for either party.
Supporting sources
." Black's Law Dictionary 1137 (rev. 4th ed. 1968). That dictionary unsurprisingly defines "purpose" as synonymous with
intent
, id. , at 1400, and "
intent
" as, among other things, "a state…
Criminal Law & ProcedureInchoate crimes; parties · Inchoate offensesUBEIntermediate