Also known as: heat of passion manslaughter · voluntary manslaughter · heat of passion
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An intentional killing that would otherwise constitute murder but occurs in the heat of passion following adequate provocation and before a reasonable cooling-off period has elapsed.
Hunter Hughes learned months earlier that his business partner had diverted funds. During a later meeting the partner made a minor remark about the old dispute. Hughes pulled a knife and stabbed the partner fatally. Because the provocation rested on a wrong from long in the past, the killing remained murder rather than heat-of-passion manslaughter.
Hilda Hernandez walked into her bedroom and found her spouse in the act of adultery with a coworker. Enraged, she immediately seized a nearby lamp and struck the coworker, causing death. The killing occurred in the heat of passion upon adequate provocation and before any cooling period, so the charge reduced to voluntary manslaughter.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Hiroshi Hasegawa learned during an argument that his neighbor had betrayed a shared business secret to a rival. Enraged by the revelation, he immediately grabbed a nearby tool and struck the neighbor fatally. The killing occurred upon adequate provocation in the heat of passion and before any cooling period, reducing the offense to heat-of-passion manslaughter.
Hana Huang admitted during police questioning that she had stabbed her spouse after discovering infidelity. The confession placed the killing squarely within the heat-of-passion framework, requiring the prosecution to prove the absence of adequate provocation beyond a reasonable doubt.
Harold Hunt was charged with murder after killing during an alleged heat-of-passion episode. The trial court required him to prove adequate provocation. Because the burden effectively forced him to disprove malice, the conviction could not stand under the rule that the state must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.
Hyun Han killed in what he claimed was heat of passion. A later judicial decision narrowed the cooling-off rule in a way that eliminated his defense. Because the change operated as an unforeseeable expansion of criminal liability, due process barred its retroactive application to his case.
The killing must be intentional. It must occur upon adequate provocation that would inflame an ordinary person. The defendant must have actually been provoked. No reasonable cooling-off period may have elapsed, and the defendant must not in fact have cooled.
Supporting sources
Yes. Catching a spouse in the act of adultery has long been recognized as classic adequate provocation sufficient to reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter when the other elements are also met.
Supporting sources
No. Mere words, trivial battery, and provocation based on wrongs that occurred long in the past are legally inadequate and do not reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter.
Supporting sources
The prosecution must prove the absence of heat of passion beyond a reasonable doubt when malice is an element of murder. A state may not shift that burden to the defendant.
Supporting sources
In some jurisdictions an honest but unreasonable belief that deadly force was necessary in self-defense mitigates the offense to voluntary manslaughter.
Supporting sources
…might invoke today: that Cobham's statements were self-inculpatory, 2 How. St. Tr., at 19, that they were not made in the heat of passion, id. , at 14, and that they were not "extracted from [him] upon any hopes or promise of Pardon," id. , at 29. It is not plausible that the Framers' only objection to the trial was that…