Also known as: overriding government interest · compelling governmental interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A governmental objective of sufficient weight to justify a burden on constitutional rights when strict scrutiny applies. The interest must be compelling and the means chosen must be narrowly tailored to achieve it. Courts evaluate whether the asserted objective qualifies as overriding by examining its importance relative to the protected right at stake.
Olympus Banking bids on a federal highway project but loses a subcontract because the prime contractor must award fifteen percent of the work to firms owned by members of designated racial groups. Olympus challenges the requirement after submitting the lowest bid. The court applies strict scrutiny and asks whether the racial classification serves an overriding governmental interest that is narrowly tailored.
Odessa Okada opens a small shop selling animals for religious sacrifice under Santeria practices. The city enacts an ordinance banning the precise method of slaughter used in those rituals while permitting other forms of animal killing. Okada sues, and the court determines that the law targets religious conduct and therefore must satisfy strict scrutiny by advancing an overriding governmental interest through the least restrictive means.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Orion Orlov, a member of the Native American Church, ingests peyote during a religious ceremony and is fired. The state denies unemployment benefits because the conduct violated criminal law. Orlov claims the denial burdens free exercise, forcing the state to show that uniform application of the prohibition serves an overriding governmental interest.
Opal Okoro seeks to enlarge her small church building to accommodate growing attendance. The city denies the permit under a zoning ordinance that applies only to religious structures. Okoro sues under RFRA, requiring the city to demonstrate that enforcing the ordinance against her serves an overriding governmental interest by the least restrictive means.
Oswald Orozco, a journalist, witnesses illegal drug activity while reporting and receives a grand jury subpoena. He refuses to testify, asserting a First Amendment privilege. The court weighs whether compelling his testimony advances an overriding governmental interest that outweighs the burden on newsgathering.
Omega Energy launches a website featuring adult-oriented financial commentary accessible to minors. Congress enacts a statute criminalizing such material on the internet. Omega challenges the law, and the court requires the government to prove that the restriction serves an overriding governmental interest through narrowly tailored means.
An overriding governmental interest must be compelling rather than merely legitimate or important. Strict scrutiny requires the government to prove the interest is of the highest order and that the challenged action is narrowly tailored to achieve it.
A court makes this determination once a plaintiff shows that a law burdens a fundamental right or employs a suspect classification. The government then bears the burden of proving the interest is compelling and the means are narrowly tailored.
No. Courts require evidence of specific, identified past discrimination by the governmental actor itself. General societal discrimination is insufficient to satisfy the compelling interest prong of strict scrutiny.
Yes. All governmental racial classifications, whether imposed by federal, state, or local governments, are subject to strict scrutiny and must serve a compelling governmental interest that is narrowly tailored.
…government to demonstrate that unbending application of its regulation to the religious objector “is essential to accomplish an overriding governmental interest,” Lee, supra , at 257-258, or represents “the least restrictive means of achieving some compelling state interest,” Thomas, supra , at 718. See, e. g., Braunfeld, supra , at 607;…