Also known as: particularized injuries · particularized harm
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An injury that affects the plaintiff in a personal and individual manner rather than as a member of the general public. The harm must be concrete and distinct to the plaintiff instead of a diffuse grievance shared equally by all citizens.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Pavel Petrov sued a federal agency claiming it violated a statute by failing to issue public integrity regulations. He alleged only that the violation undermined public trust in government and shared that concern with every other citizen. The court dismissed the suit because Petrov identified no concrete effect on himself beyond the generalized interest in lawful agency action.
Priscilla Parks, a U.S. citizen whose Syrian relatives were barred from entering the country under an executive order, challenged the order in federal court. She showed that the order directly prevented her family members from visiting and that the restriction was traceable to the challenged policy. The court found her injury particularized because it singled her out from the public at large.
Philip Powell and other Rochester residents sued a suburb alleging its zoning practices excluded low-income housing. None of the plaintiffs owned property in the suburb or had concrete plans to move there. The court held that their interest amounted to a generalized grievance shared by all low-income persons and therefore lacked particularization.
Pinnacle Holdings regularly bid on federal highway contracts. It alleged that a federal program awarding extra compensation to subcontractors owned by socially and economically disadvantaged persons placed it at a competitive disadvantage on future bids. The court recognized standing because the classification directly impaired Pinnacle Holdings' ability to compete on equal terms.
Piper Patel and other members of an environmental group regularly used a river downstream from a permitted discharge point. They alleged that the defendant's violations would imminently diminish the river's recreational and aesthetic value for their personal use. The court found the injury particularized because it affected identified individuals in a concrete way rather than the public generally.
Phoebe Park, a member of Congress who voted against the Line Item Veto Act, challenged the statute after the President used it to cancel specific spending provisions. She alleged that the Act directly nullified the legal effect of her vote on those measures. The court dismissed the suit because the claimed injury was an institutional harm shared equally by all legislators rather than a personal, particularized injury.
A particularized injury affects the plaintiff in a personal and individual way. A generalized grievance is an undifferentiated interest shared by all citizens in having the government follow the law. Courts reject standing when plaintiffs allege only the latter.
Supporting sources
Yes when at least one identified member suffers a concrete and particularized harm. The organization must show that the member would have standing in his or her own right and that the claim is germane to the group's purpose. Bare allegations of harm to the public or to unidentified members are insufficient.
…of endangered species. This is a generalized grievance. It is an interest shared by all members of the public. It is not a particularized injury. It does not give the respondents a right to sue. The respondents also claim that they have standing because some of their members observe animals in the United States and abroad. This is…
…U. S. 693, 700 (2013). It requires allegations—and, eventually, proof—that the plaintiff “personal[ly]” suffered a concrete and particularized injury in connection with the conduct about which he complains. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins , 578 U. S. , (2016) (slip op., at 7). In a case arising from an alleged violation of the…
…does not change the analysis. A resident of Rochester who has no specific plans to move to Penfield has not suffered the kind of particularized injury necessary for standing. Next, we consider the standing of Metro-Act of Rochester, Inc. This is an organization whose members include low and moderate income persons. An organization may…
…compensation clauses. We held that Adarand has standing to seek forward-looking relief because it sufficiently alleged a particularized injury
…Our holding concerns only redressability. It remains for the plaintiff to establish the other elements of standing (such as a particularized injury
Supporting sources
No. A bare statutory violation without any concrete or particularized harm to the plaintiff does not satisfy Article III. The plaintiff must show that the violation caused a distinct injury rather than a diffuse interest in government compliance.
Supporting sources
Members of Congress generally lack standing to challenge federal statutes based on institutional injuries shared equally by all legislators. Article III requires a personal, particularized injury rather than an abstract dilution of legislative power.
Supporting sources
The plaintiff must allege concrete plans to use a specific area that will be imminently affected. A general interest in environmental protection or in having the government follow environmental statutes is a classic generalized grievance that fails the particularity requirement.
Supporting sources