Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public. The interference must affect the community at large in health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience rather than a single individual.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Hog Farm Odors Disrupt Public Spaces
Prime Logistics sprays liquid manure on fields next to Fairview. Strong odors and flies reach public parks, school grounds, and community events for over a year, rendering those areas unusable. Residents sue, claiming the operations interfere with rights shared by the public at large.
Feedlot Operations Reach New Homes
Spur Industries maintains a large cattle feedlot. Del E. Webb develops residential lots downwind. Prevailing winds carry flies and odors onto the new homes and surrounding public areas, prompting a suit alleging interference with rights held by the community.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.494 P.2d 700 (Ariz. 1972)
Newspaper Declared Public Nuisance
A periodical regularly publishes malicious and defamatory content. State officials seek to abate the publication as a public nuisance affecting the broader community. The action proceeds under a statute targeting such ongoing interference with public rights.
Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson283 U.S. 697 (1931)
Beachfront Building Ban Challenged
Lucas acquires coastal lots for development. A state statute later bars all construction to protect dunes and beaches. Lucas claims the total prohibition interferes with public rights in a manner that must rest on established nuisance principles rather than new regulation.
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council505 U.S. 1003 (1992)
Warrantless Inspection for Nuisance
City inspectors enter a residence without a warrant to check for conditions amounting to a public nuisance. The occupant challenges the entry. The dispute centers on whether the inspection authority extends to abating interference with community-wide rights in health and safety.
Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco387 U.S. 523, 87 S.Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967)
Power Plant Emissions Reach Multiple States
American Electric Power operates coal-fired plants that emit large quantities of carbon dioxide. Several states and private parties allege the emissions create a public nuisance by interfering with rights to clean air and stable climate shared across the region.
American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut131 S.Ct. 2527, 564 U.S. 410, 180 L.Ed.2d 435
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does public nuisance differ from private nuisance?+
Public nuisance interferes with a right common to the general public, such as use of public spaces or community health. Private nuisance interferes with an individual's use and enjoyment of land. The same conduct can create both when it affects both public rights and specific property interests.
Supporting sources
Who may bring a public nuisance claim?+
Government entities typically bring public nuisance actions. Private parties may sue when they suffer special harm different in kind from that experienced by the general public, such as unique economic loss from blocked access to a public resource.
What factors determine whether interference is unreasonable?+
Courts consider whether the conduct significantly affects public health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience. Additional factors include whether the conduct violates a statute or regulation, continues over time, or produces permanent effects that the actor knows will substantially impair public rights.
Supporting sources
Can regulatory permits or economic benefits defeat a public nuisance claim?+
Permits and economic utility are relevant but not dispositive. When interference with public rights remains severe, continuing, and unmitigated, courts may still find a public nuisance despite regulatory approval or community benefits.
505 U.S. 1003 (1992)Property
…Mugler line of cases recognizes governmental power to prohibit "noxious" uses of property i. e. , uses of property akin to "public nuisances"without having to pay compensation. But they would not have characterized the Beachfront Management Act's " primary purpose [as] the prevention of a nuisance." 304 S. C., at 395, 404 S.…