Also known as: reckless indifference · depraved-heart · extreme recklessness
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Extreme recklessness that creates an unjustifiably high risk of death and manifests a depraved heart. This mental state supplies implied malice sufficient for murder at common law.
Roland Rhodes fired multiple rounds into an apartment building he knew was usually occupied, believing one particular room was empty. Bullets penetrated walls and killed a resident in an adjacent unit. The conduct created an extreme and unjustifiable risk of death that satisfied the mental state for murder.
Riley Rivera hosted a late-night party on a rooftop deck with a low railing after receiving an explicit warning of probable fatal falls. An intoxicated guest fell to his death. The decision created an extreme and unjustifiable risk of death that satisfied the mental state for murder.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Roger Ramirez, trustee of a family trust, repeatedly invested trust assets in high-risk ventures after receiving warnings that the conduct would likely cause deaths among dependent beneficiaries. The investments led to fatal neglect. The conduct created an extreme and unjustifiable risk of death that satisfied the mental state for murder.
Ralph Richardson approved a live television stunt involving contestants running near high-speed forklifts after receiving an explicit warning of probable death. No barriers or spotters were provided. A contestant was struck and killed. The approval created a risk level exceeding that required for involuntary manslaughter.
Rachel Ramirez made a public statement she knew would induce others to enter a lethally dangerous structure. She expressed no concern over the probable deaths. Several purchasers died. The indifference satisfied the standard for implied malice supporting murder.
Renata Russo participated in planning a prison break, supplied weapons, and remained present during subsequent kidnappings and murders without intervening. She continued the criminal episode afterward. The participation and inaction demonstrated reckless indifference to human life sufficient for capital eligibility.
Reckless indifference to the value of human life requires a higher degree of risk and callousness than the criminal negligence or recklessness that supports involuntary manslaughter. The former approaches a virtual certainty of death or very serious injury and manifests a depraved heart, while the latter involves a gross deviation from reasonable care that creates a high but lesser risk.
Supporting sources
Yes. At common law this mental state supplies implied malice and supports a murder conviction even without an intent to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm. The extreme risk and indifference alone satisfy the malice element.
Supporting sources
Yes when the warning identifies an obvious probability of death and the defendant proceeds anyway for non-essential reasons such as commercial gain. The conscious disregard of a known lethal danger meets the standard for implied malice.
Supporting sources
No. Felony murder rests on an intent to commit the underlying felony, while reckless indifference to the value of human life is a distinct form of implied malice based on extreme risk creation independent of any felony.
Supporting sources
…481 U. S. 137, 154, 158 (1987), upheld a state law authorizing capital punishment for major participation in a felony with reckless indifference to life where only 11 of the 37 death penalty States (30%) prohibited such punishment. Stanford , 492 U. S., at 372, upheld a state law permitting execution of defendants who committed a…