Also known as:severe emotional distress · emotional distress
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
Severe mental anguish or suffering that exceeds ordinary emotional upset and is of a nature that a reasonable person would regard as substantial. It forms a required element of intentional infliction of emotional distress when caused by extreme and outrageous conduct. The distress must be shown through evidence of intensity and duration rather than transient upset.
See Our Sources· 4 primary sources
Cases
Statutes
Restatements
How its tested
Common Examples
6
Manager's False Arrest Threats
Loss-prevention manager Daniel Ortiz confined seventeen-year-old cashier Serena Soto in a back room for hours and repeatedly told her that police would arrest her for theft and that she might not survive prison. Soto began hyperventilating and begged to call her mother, yet Ortiz continued. She later suffered panic attacks requiring hospitalization. The conduct meets the threshold for serious emotional distress because the prolonged false threats produced medically significant symptoms that a jury could find substantial.
Funeral Protest Signs
Members of a church group picketed a military funeral on public land with signs expressing political and moral views about government policy and homosexuality. The signs caused family members including Solomon Silver intense grief and lasting emotional pain. Because the speech addressed matters of public concern and occurred peacefully without additional unprotected conduct, no tort liability arises even though the signs produced serious emotional distress.
Public Accusation of Theft
Executive director Nora publicly accused caseworker Lena of stealing donor files and threatened to post her photo as a thief in a crowded shelter. Lena's brother Simon Stern witnessed the outburst and suffered recurrent panic-triggered asthma attacks. Stern was present when the conduct occurred and his resulting emotional distress produced bodily harm, satisfying the requirements for recovery as a bystander.
Wrench-Throwing Incident
Laborer Luis hurled a metal wrench at coworker Sierra Santos's head from a scaffold during a dispute. The wrench missed and landed several feet behind her. Santos never saw or heard the throw because she wore ear protection and faced away. Although Luis committed an intentional tort aimed at bodily harm, Santos cannot recover for any resulting emotional distress because that distress is the only legal consequence of the conduct.
Car Accident Victim Damages
Driver Samantha Stone suffered a broken leg and ongoing anxiety after a collision caused by another motorist. In her personal-injury action she seeks compensation for both the physical injury and the emotional distress that accompanied it. The emotional distress qualifies as a recoverable element of damages because it arose directly from the bodily harm inflicted by the tortious conduct.
Murder Defense Strategy
After discovering his spouse with another person, Scott Summers killed the other person hours later. At trial Summers seeks to introduce evidence of his immediate and continuing emotional distress to support a claim that the killing occurred in the heat of passion. The prosecution must still prove the elements of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. The claimed distress does not shift any burden to the defense.
Patterson v. New York432 U.S. 197, 97 S.Ct. 2319, 53 L.Ed.2d 281
On December 27, 1970, Gordon Patterson shot and killed John Northrup in Glens Falls, New York. After a brief and unstable marriage, Patterson had become estranged from his wife Roberta. Roberta had resumed an association with Northrup, a neighbor to whom she had been engaged before her marriage to Patterson.
Patterson borrowed a rifle from an acquaintance and went to the residence of his father-in-law. There he observed his wife through a window in a state of semiundress in Northrup's presence. He entered the house and killed Northrup by shooting him twice in the head. Patterson was charged with second-degree murder.
At his jury trial in Warren County Court, Patterson raised the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance and presented psychiatric evidence tending to show that he had been extremely emotionally disturbed when he killed Northrup. The jury was instructed that the prosecution had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crime of murder. The defendant had the burden of proving the affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
The jury convicted Patterson of second-degree murder. The Appellate Division affirmed the conviction. While appeal to the New York Court of Appeals was pending, this Court decided Mullaney v. Wilbur. The New York Court of Appeals nevertheless affirmed, distinguishing the Maine statute at issue in Mullaney and holding that New York's allocation of the burden of proof on the affirmative defense was consistent with due process. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari limited to the question whether the burden of proof placed on the defendant by New York law is consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
5 common questions
Students Frequently Ask...
What level of proof is required to show serious emotional distress in an IIED claim?
The plaintiff must present evidence that the distress was severe in intensity and duration rather than fleeting upset. Medical evidence of panic attacks or hospitalization strengthens the showing but is not always required when the conduct itself is extreme.
Supporting sources
Can a bystander recover for serious emotional distress caused by conduct aimed at someone else?
Yes when the bystander is an immediate family member present at the time or any other person present whose distress results in bodily harm. The underlying conduct must still be extreme and outrageous and directed at the third person.
Supporting sources
Does the First Amendment bar recovery for serious emotional distress caused by offensive speech?
Speech on matters of public concern receives special protection even when it produces severe emotional distress. Peaceful picketing accompanied by offensive signs on public land near a funeral is protected unless additional unprotected conduct occurs.
Supporting sources
Can a plaintiff recover for serious emotional distress that is the only consequence of another intentional tort?
No. Conduct that is tortious because it intends bodily harm or invasion of another interest does not create liability when the only legal consequence is emotional distress.
Supporting sources
Is serious emotional distress recoverable as damages in a personal-injury action?
Yes. A plaintiff whose interests of personality have been tortiously invaded may recover damages for emotional distress that accompanies bodily harm.
Supporting sources
and that consequently his waiver of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights was involuntary.” Affirmation of D. Porco, Esq., Para. 7, at 5. The Supreme Court has not foreclosed the notion…
Trusts and Estates Trusts and Future InterestsTrusts · Types of trustsUBEFoundational