Also known as:special scrutinies · specially scrutinized · heightened scrutiny
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard of judicial review more demanding than rational basis scrutiny. It requires the government to demonstrate that a challenged law or policy is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest when the measure burdens the fundamental right to marital privacy.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Married Couple Faces Contraceptive Restriction
Sierra Santos and her husband sought contraceptive counseling at a state hospital that required them to attend procreation workshops and disclose intimate details before any prescription. The hospital policy directly conditioned access on participation in the mandated sessions. A court applied special scrutiny because the rule burdened the couple's marital privacy interest and struck down the program after finding no sufficiently tailored justification.
Group Home Faces Zoning Barrier
Samantha Stone sought to open a group home for adults with intellectual disabilities in Cleburne. The city required a special permit that neighboring property owners opposed on grounds of fear and prejudice. The court reviewed the ordinance under rational basis because the class received no heightened protection and upheld the permit denial.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
City of Cleburne, Texas, et al. v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., et al.473 U.S. 432, 105 S. Ct. 3249, 87 L. Ed. 2d 313 (1985)
Women Seek Admission to State School
Stella Shapiro applied to the Virginia Military Institute and was denied solely because of her sex. The state defended the single-sex policy as advancing educational diversity. The court applied special scrutiny to the gender classification and required an exceedingly persuasive justification that the policy failed to meet.
United States v. Virginia518 U.S. 515, 533 (1996)
Religious Practice Faces Ordinance Ban
Sofia Stern's church planned ritual animal sacrifice as part of its worship. The city enacted an ordinance that prohibited the practice while permitting other forms of animal killing. The court applied special scrutiny because the law targeted religious conduct and invalidated the ordinance as lacking a compelling interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah508 U.S. 520, 113 S. Ct. 2217, 124 L. Ed. 2d 472 (1993)
Abortion Regulation Faces Review
Spencer Silver challenged a state law banning most abortions after fifteen weeks. The state argued the restriction advanced maternal health. The court reviewed the measure under rational basis after Dobbs and upheld the law as rationally related to legitimate interests.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022)
Family Leave Policy Faces Challenge
Sasha Stone, a state employee, was denied paid family leave available only to women under a state policy. She argued the sex-based distinction violated equal protection. The court applied special scrutiny to the classification and required the state to show an exceedingly persuasive justification tied to actual differences in family roles.
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs538 U.S. 721 (2003)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When does a court apply special scrutiny rather than rational basis review?+
Special scrutiny applies when a law burdens a fundamental right such as marital privacy. The government must then demonstrate that the measure is narrowly tailored to a compelling interest.
Supporting sources
Does special scrutiny apply to laws targeting religious conduct?+
Yes. When a law singles out religious practices for prohibition while permitting comparable secular conduct, courts apply special scrutiny and require the government to show a compelling interest pursued by the least restrictive means.
What happens to a marital privacy claim after Dobbs under special scrutiny analysis?+
Dobbs returned abortion regulation to rational basis review, but special scrutiny continues to govern direct burdens on the marital zone of privacy recognized in earlier cases involving contraception and intimate association.
Supporting sources
539 U.S. 558 (2003)Constitutional Law
…scrutiny under the doctrine of "substantive due process." Roe and Casey , of course, subjected the restriction of abortion to heightened scrutiny without even attempting to establish that the freedom to abort was rooted in this Nation's tradition. (2) Bowers , the Court says, has been subject to "substantial and continuing…