Also known as: statement against interest · statement against interests · statements against interests · hearsay exception · admission against interest
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A hearsay exception permitting admission of an out-of-court declaration when the declarant is unavailable as a witness and the statement was so contrary to the declarant's proprietary, pecuniary, or penal interest that a reasonable person would not have made it unless believing it to be true.
Sydney Santos, a cargo ship third mate, wrote in the ship's log that he deliberately ignored storm warnings to maintain schedule. Santos remains detained in Belgium on unrelated charges. Summit Bank, the cargo insurer, offers the log in its civil suit against the shipping company after reasonable efforts fail to secure Santos's attendance. The court admits the entry because Santos is unavailable and the statement exposes him to civil liability.
Stella Shapiro told her coworker that she personally overrode safety valves to avoid production shortfalls that could cost her job. Shapiro later died in an unrelated accident. Solstice Ventures offers the coworker's testimony in a negligence suit to prove the company's knowledge of risks. The court admits only Shapiro's statements about her own overrides because non-self-inculpatory portions blaming a manager are excluded.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Serena Soto, a facility operator, told a colleague she had disabled automatic shutoffs during prior alarms because shutdowns risked her termination. Soto moved abroad and ignored subpoenas despite the proponent's letters rogatory and diplomatic efforts. Starlight Media offers the colleague's testimony in a negligence action. The court admits the statements because Soto is unavailable and the remarks expose her to civil liability.
Santiago Sanchez, a plant manager, admitted in a break-room conversation that he directed overrides of safety systems to meet production targets. Sanchez died before trial. Sterling Manufacturing offers the statement in a civil suit after the proponent shows the statement meets trustworthiness factors under the residual rule. The court considers admission under the residual exception because the statement against interest requirements are not fully satisfied.
Sierra Santos gave police a detailed statement admitting she participated in a scheme and naming Simone Sanders as the leader. Santos later became unavailable. The prosecution offers the statement against Sanders in a criminal prosecution. The court admits the statement because it is genuinely self-inculpatory and satisfies the against-interest test despite its testimonial character.
A lab analyst prepared a certificate stating that seized substances tested positive for a controlled drug. The analyst is unavailable at trial. The prosecution offers the certificate against the defendant in a drug case. The court admits the certificate because the analyst's admission of the testing procedure is genuinely against the analyst's penal interest.
Yes. The exception applies in both civil and criminal cases when the declarant is unavailable and the statement meets the against-interest test. Detention abroad satisfies unavailability if reasonable efforts cannot secure attendance.
Supporting sources
Yes. Only discrete remarks that are genuinely self-inculpatory are admissible. Portions that merely incriminate another person remain inadmissible even if embedded in an overall inculpatory statement.
Supporting sources
No. The corroborating-circumstances requirement applies only when the statement is offered in a criminal case. In civil actions the focus remains solely on whether a reasonable person would have made the statement only if believing it true.
Supporting sources
…statement was inadmissible under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, it was admissible under a “firmly rooted” hearsay exception for statements against penal interest and that admitting it did not violate the Constitution. We granted certiorari to determine whether the State’s use of Sylvia’s statement violated the…