Also known as: substantially justified · substantially justify
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A factual and legal basis for a discovery certification or other litigation position that is reasonable under the circumstances and sufficient to avoid sanctions. The standard requires an inquiry into available information that supports the position taken rather than a reflexive or unsupported assertion.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Sofia Stern's counsel signed responses claiming all requested GPS logs were irretrievably lost after a system upgrade. The client had received an offer from its regular IT vendor to attempt recovery, yet counsel neither contacted the vendor nor disclosed the offer. The court found the certification lacked substantial justification and imposed sanctions requiring payment of the opposing party's expenses.
State B required all applicants for bar admission to maintain a permanent residence within the state for at least one year before applying. Sasha Stone, a licensed attorney residing in State A, challenged the rule as violating the Privileges and Immunities Clause. The court held that the residency requirement lacked substantial justification and could not stand.
State C denied reciprocal admission to out-of-state lawyers unless they maintained an in-state office. Sophia Singh, a practitioner in State D, sought admission without relocating. The court ruled that the office requirement infringed the right to pursue the common calling of law practice and lacked substantial justification under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
A state statute prohibited physicians from prescribing medication to hasten death for terminally ill patients. Stella Shapiro, a physician, argued the ban lacked substantial justification when applied to competent patients who had made informed end-of-life decisions. The court upheld the statute after finding the state's interests provided the required justification.
A union sought to enforce an arbitration award against a textile manufacturer for breach of a collective bargaining agreement. Scott Summers, counsel for the manufacturer, resisted enforcement on grounds that the arbitrator exceeded his authority. The court enforced the award after determining that the resistance lacked substantial justification.
A federal court sitting in diversity had to decide whether to apply state or federal law to a contract issue. Stephen Shaw, counsel for the defendant, urged application of state law without citing controlling precedent or distinguishing federal interests. The appellate court found the argument lacked substantial justification and remanded for application of federal law.
A certification lacks substantial justification when counsel fails to conduct a reasonable inquiry into information reasonably available to the party before signing. Blanket objections or assertions of unavailability that rest on unexamined files or ignored vendor offers violate the rule. The court must impose sanctions when the violation occurs without substantial justification.
Supporting sources
…own bodies, medical care, and, fundamentally, the future course of their lives," and who have concluded responsibly and with substantial justification that the brief and anguished remainders of their lives have lost virtually all value to them. Respondents fully embrace the notion that the State must be free to impose reasonable…
…in a suit against the United States to recover attorneys' fees and costs, but only if the position of the United States was not "
…of the evidence. Here, the Court of Appeals determined that the District Court "applied the correct legal standard and offered substantial justification
…mandated by Rule 11”); Pierce , 487 U. S., at 562 (“[T]he question whether the Government’s litigating position has been ‘substantially justified
…legal representation" or "meaningful access to courts," the court found, was infringed by the fee limitation — again without
No. An attorney's long experience with a company's safety record does not substitute for examining readily accessible archives when discovery requests target prior incidents. The presence of contradictory internal reports that were never reviewed demonstrates that the certification was not formed after a reasonable inquiry.
Supporting sources
States may not impose discriminatory residency requirements on nonresident lawyers seeking to practice law unless the requirements rest on substantial justification. Speculative assumptions about out-of-state lawyers' competence or availability do not supply the required justification. The practice of law is a protected common calling under the Clause.
Supporting sources
Serving broad requests immediately after a firm trial date is set, without narrowing to already produced materials, supports an inference that the requests were interposed to harass or increase costs. The absence of any attempt to use less burdensome alternatives indicates that the certification lacked substantial justification.
Supporting sources