Also known as:substantial probabilities · substantial likelihood
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A legal threshold denoting a significant chance that an event or outcome will occur. The standard requires more than a mere possibility but less than certainty.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Lawyer's Forum Post Risks Prejudice
Simon Stern, counsel for a wildfire victim, posted detailed accusations on a local online forum that an insurer had trained adjusters to destroy records. The post went viral in the county where jury selection was weeks away. Because the statements were likely to reach prospective jurors and introduce untested allegations, the lawyer's conduct met the threshold that created a substantial probability of material prejudice to the pending trial.
Single-Photo Display Remains Reliable
Two days after a server-room intrusion, police showed Gene a single company photograph of former employee Betty. Gene stated it looked like the intruder. Despite the suggestive procedure, the short interval and Gene's certainty at a later lineup established that the identification carried no substantial probability of misidentification under the totality of the circumstances.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Restatements
Hornbooks
Study Supplements
Vague Safe-Harbor Language Challenged
A state disciplinary rule barred extrajudicial statements creating a substantial probability of prejudicing a trial but permitted statements about the general nature of the defense without clear limits. An attorney disciplined for a political press release argued the rule failed to give fair notice. The vagueness of the safe harbor created a substantial probability that protected speech would be chilled, rendering the rule unenforceable as applied.
Closure Request Requires Specific Findings
A defendant facing heavy local media coverage moved to close a preliminary hearing. The trial court had to determine whether there was a substantial probability that publicity would prejudice the right to a fair trial and whether reasonable alternatives existed. Without those on-the-record findings, closure was denied and the proceeding remained open.
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court (Press-Enterprise I)464 U.S. 501, 104 S.Ct. 819, 78 L.Ed.2d 629 (1984)
Statistical Evidence Fails Threshold
McCleskey presented Baldus study data showing racial disparities in capital sentencing. The Court required proof of a substantial probability that the discriminatory procedure produced his sentence. Raw statistical disparities alone did not meet that threshold, so the equal-protection claim failed.
McCleskey v. Kemp481 U.S. 279 (1987)
Frisk Lacked Adequate Basis
An officer observed Sibron talking with known narcotics users and then reached into his pocket. The brief conversation supplied no facts creating a substantial probability that Sibron was armed or engaged in criminal activity. The resulting seizure therefore violated the Fourth Amendment.
Sibron v. New York392 U.S. 40 (1968)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does substantial probability differ from probable cause in will-contest cases?+
Probable cause for a no-contest clause challenge exists when a reasonable person would conclude there is a substantial probability the claim will succeed. The two standards therefore overlap. The substantial-probability inquiry supplies the objective content of probable cause.
Supporting sources
When does a suggestive identification procedure violate due process?+
Due process is violated only when the procedure creates a substantial probability of misidentification under the totality of the circumstances. Reliability factors such as opportunity to view, degree of attention, and time between crime and identification can overcome suggestiveness.
Supporting sources
What must a court find before closing a hearing to protect trial fairness?+
The court must make specific findings that there is a substantial probability publicity will prejudice the defendant's fair-trial right and that reasonable alternatives cannot adequately protect that right.
Supporting sources
Does a lawyer's public statement always create a substantial probability of prejudice?+
No. The statement must be one the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated and will have a substantial probability of materially prejudicing the proceeding. Preexisting public discussion and the specificity of new allegations are relevant to the assessment.
Supporting sources
481 U.S. 279 (1987)Criminal Procedure
…defendants to be sentenced to death. Supp. Exh. 47. With respect to the second prong, McCleskey must prove that there is a substantial likelihood that his death sentence is due to racial factors. See Hunter v. Underwood , 471 U. S. 222, 228 (1985). The Court of Appeals assumed the validity of the Baldus study and found that it…