Also known as: ultra vires reviews · ultra vires doctrine · judicial review
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Judicial examination of whether a governmental or organizational action falls outside the legal authority granted to the actor. The inquiry focuses on the scope of delegated power rather than the wisdom or policy merits of the decision. When the action exceeds that scope the reviewing court may invalidate it.
Ulysses Ulrich, a steel-mill owner, challenges an executive order directing seizure of his facilities during a labor dispute. The court examines whether the President possessed constitutional or statutory power to issue the order. Finding the order outside that authority the court sets it aside.
Uma Underwood petitions the Supreme Court after Congress repeals the specific appellate route for her constitutional claim. The Court determines whether the repeal eliminates every avenue of federal review. Because alternative paths remain the statute is upheld as within congressional power.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Ursula Ureña, an accounting firm partner, sues the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board claiming its dual-layer removal protection exceeds statutory and constitutional limits. The court reviews whether Congress could insulate the Board from presidential oversight. Finding the structure beyond congressional authority the court severs the offending provision.
Una Ueda, a steel-company executive, contests an executive order seizing mills to avert a strike. The court assesses whether the President acted within constitutional war or domestic powers. Concluding the seizure exceeded those powers the court enjoins enforcement.
Unity Underhill, a citizen held as an enemy combatant, petitions for release after the executive asserts inherent authority. The court examines whether statutes or the Constitution authorize the detention. Finding no such authority the court orders either release or proper criminal proceedings.
Uptown Apparel, a coastal manufacturer, sues the EPA for declining to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. The court reviews whether the statute grants the agency discretion to refuse regulation on policy grounds. Finding the refusal beyond the agency's statutory latitude the court remands for further proceedings.
Ultra vires review asks only whether the actor possessed legal authority to act at all. Arbitrary-and-capricious review assumes authority exists and examines the reasonableness of the choice made within that authority. Courts apply the former when the claim is that the action lies outside the statute or constitution.
Yes. Members of common-interest communities may obtain judicial review when an association acts beyond its governing documents or corporate powers. The same label covers both governmental and private organizational actions that exceed delegated authority.
A court finds an action ultra vires when the agency has no plausible statutory basis for the regulation or order. The inquiry focuses on the relationship between the agency's asserted power and the text of the enabling statute rather than on the policy merits of the decision.
…369 U. S. 186, 204 (1962). It is clear that Congress, in enacting 2 U. S. C. § 437h (1970 ed., Supp. IV), intended to provide judicial review to the extent permitted by Art. III. In our view, the complaint in this case demonstrates that at least some of the appellants have a sufficient "personal stake" in a determination of the…