Also known as:pro se attorney · pro se · self-represented attorney
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A licensed attorney who elects to represent himself or herself in a legal proceeding without retaining separate counsel. The attorney assumes all responsibilities of advocacy while remaining subject to the same procedural and ethical obligations that apply to any other litigant.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Judge Handling Family Rent Claims
Faith, a sitting housing-court judge, holds a power of attorney from her father and files small-claims actions for unpaid rent. At each hearing she stands at counsel table, argues facts, and examines witnesses while her father remains silent. Because she is acting as lawyer for her father rather than pro se, her active courtroom advocacy on another's behalf violates the prohibition on practicing law even though she receives no compensation.
Attorney Defendant at Child-Witness Hearing
Alex, a licensed criminal-defense attorney charged with obstruction, appears without counsel at a pretrial hearing involving a child witness. The statute allowing closed-circuit testimony expressly excludes cases in which the defendant is an attorney pro se. The court therefore requires the child to testify in open court because Alex's status triggers the exception.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Study Supplements
Maryland v. Craig497 U.S. 836 (1990)
Solo Practitioner Asserting Self-Representation
Carlos Lopez, a solo practitioner charged with misappropriating client funds, moves to discharge appointed counsel and proceed alone. He clearly states his desire to represent himself. Because Lopez is already an attorney, the court must still conduct a knowing-and-intelligent waiver colloquy before permitting him to continue as an attorney pro se.
Faretta v. California422 U.S. 806 (1975)
Lawyer Defendant Negotiating Plea
An indigent attorney charged with a federal offense appears without counsel at a plea hearing. The government may discuss a plea agreement directly with the defendant because he is proceeding pro se. The court must still ensure that any waiver of counsel is knowing and intelligent before accepting the plea.
United States v. Mezzanatto513 U.S. 196 (1995)
Attorney Waiving Miranda Rights
A licensed attorney arrested for a state crime invokes his right to remain silent but later reinitiates contact with police. Because he is an attorney pro se, the court must determine whether his waiver of counsel was knowing and intelligent before admitting any resulting statements.
Moran v. Burbine475 U.S. 412 (1986)
Lawyer Representing Self in Traffic Court
A solo practitioner charged with a traffic offense appears without counsel and argues his own motion to suppress. The court treats him as an attorney pro se and holds him to the same procedural rules that apply to any litigant, including the requirement that all objections be preserved on the record.
State v. Williams4 Wash.App. 908, 484 P.2d 1167
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
Does a judge who is an attorney pro se violate the prohibition on practicing law when handling family matters?+
A judge may act pro se in all legal matters. The rule prohibits a judge from serving as the lawyer for a family member in any forum, even without compensation and even when holding a power of attorney. Active courtroom advocacy on behalf of another exceeds the narrow permission for uncompensated document work or advice given outside a forum.
Supporting sources
Must a court conduct a waiver colloquy when an attorney defendant seeks to proceed pro se?+
Yes. Even a licensed attorney has a constitutional right to self-representation only if the waiver of counsel is knowing and intelligent. The court must still inquire into the defendant's understanding of the charges, penalties, and risks of proceeding without counsel.
Supporting sources
Can an indigent attorney defendant be denied appointed counsel solely because of legal training?+
No. The constitutional right to appointed counsel at critical stages applies to all indigent defendants regardless of profession. Legal training does not eliminate the right or excuse the court from securing a valid waiver before allowing self-representation.
Supporting sources
Does the right to self-representation apply at pretrial stages for an attorney defendant?+
Yes. The Assistance of Counsel guarantee covers critical pretrial stages such as initial appearances and motion hearings. An indigent attorney defendant must receive appointed counsel at those stages unless a knowing and intelligent waiver is obtained on the record.
Supporting sources
550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (2007)Civil Procedure
…Conley Court cited approvingly was written by Judge Clark himself. In Dioguardi v. Durning , 139 F.2d 774 (2d Cir. 1944), the pro se plaintiff, an importer of “tonics,” charged the customs inspector with auctioning off the plaintiff’s former merchandise for less than was bid for it — and indeed for an amount equal to the…