Also known as:fair attribution test · state action
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard for determining whether private conduct qualifies as state action under the Fourteenth Amendment when a private entity performs a public function traditionally and exclusively reserved to the state.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Peremptory Strikes in Civil Trial
Frank Fisher sued Frontier Capital in state court over a disputed contract. During jury selection the company's lawyer used peremptory challenges to remove every Black member of the venire. The trial judge enforced the strikes without objection. Because jury selection is a traditional public function carried out with active court participation, the racially discriminatory strikes are fairly attributable to the state.
Trust Notice Mailed by Bank
Fatima Flores held a beneficial interest in a trust administered by Central Hanover Bank. The bank published notice of an accounting proceeding in a newspaper rather than mailing individual letters to known beneficiaries. A state court later approved the accounting. The bank's choice of notice method, made under judicial supervision and pursuant to state procedural rules, is fairly attributable to the state.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Hornbooks
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co.339 U.S. 306, 313-314 (1950)
City Taking for Private Developer
Forrest Falconer owned waterfront property that the City of New London condemned and transferred to a private developer under an economic-development plan. City officials selected the parcels and filed the eminent-domain actions. The city's decision to seize and convey the land through its own condemnation power is fairly attributable to the state.
Kelo, et al. v. City of New London545 U.S. 469, 503 (2005)
Zoning Decision Blocking Housing
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. sought a zoning variance to build integrated housing in the Village of Arlington Heights. Village officials denied the application after public hearings revealed racial motivations. The village's formal denial, issued through its zoning ordinance and enforced by local police, is fairly attributable to the state.
Arlington Heights, Village of v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.429 U.S. 252, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977), on remand 558 F.2d 1283 (7th Cir.1977)
School Flag-Salute Requirement
Freya Freeman's children attended a public school whose board required daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Teachers disciplined students who refused on religious grounds. The board's policy, adopted and enforced by public employees under state compulsory-education statutes, is fairly attributable to the state.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)
State Jury-Trial Mandate
Fumiko Fujimoto was charged in state court with a serious misdemeanor carrying a possible two-year sentence. The trial judge denied her request for a jury. The court's refusal, made pursuant to a state statute limiting jury trials to felonies, is fairly attributable to the state.
Duncan v. Louisiana391 U.S. 145, 166 (1968)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
When does a private company's lease of space in a state-owned building create state action?+
A symbiotic relationship arises when the state derives ongoing financial benefits, such as below-market rent or profit sharing, from the private tenant's operations. That interdependence makes the tenant's discriminatory conduct fairly attributable to the state under the Equal Protection Clause.
Supporting sources
Does a private firm processing state court filing fees become a state actor?+
Exclusive delegation of a core judicial function combined with intensive state oversight and pre-approval of protocols can supply the direct involvement needed to make the firm's actions fairly attributable to the state.
Supporting sources
Why are peremptory challenges by private litigants treated as state action?+
Jury selection is a traditional public function performed inside a courtroom with active judicial supervision and enforcement. Those features render the private litigant's discriminatory strikes fairly attributable to the state.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to…