Also known as: gross deviations from a reasonable standard of care · gross negligence · criminal negligence
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Conduct amounting to criminal negligence. It is a substantial departure from the care a reasonable person would exercise under the circumstances that creates a high risk of death or serious bodily harm.
Quentin approved a live warehouse stunt with high-speed forklifts and no barriers despite an engineer's written warning of probable death. A forklift struck and killed contestant Louis. The gross deviation from a reasonable standard of care supported involuntary manslaughter liability on a criminal-negligence theory.
Leah ran unauthorized securities sales sessions that violated felony regulations. When confronted she shoved Silas into a glass partition that shattered and caused fatal lacerations. The shove met the gross deviation standard and supported involuntary manslaughter under the criminal-negligence theory.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Bernice took a charter vessel out despite a severe-weather forecast and an inoperable backup radio. The vessel suffered major damage requiring an expensive rescue. Her choice constituted a gross deviation from a reasonable standard of care and exposed her to liability for the resulting losses.
Guillermo directed a film crew to operate heavy equipment without required permits or spotters after receiving explicit safety reports. A crew member was killed when a machine crossed into a marked lane. The decision reflected a gross deviation from a reasonable standard of care and supported an involuntary-manslaughter charge.
Genevieve knew she suffered from epilepsy yet drove without medication and suffered a seizure that caused a fatal collision. The decision to operate the vehicle created the high risk of death required for criminal negligence. Her conduct met the gross deviation standard and supported involuntary manslaughter.
George posted repeated messages that a reasonable person would view as true threats of violence. The posts caused the recipient severe emotional distress and required protective measures. The pattern reflected a gross deviation from a reasonable standard of care and supported criminal liability on a negligence theory.
Criminal negligence requires a substantially greater departure from reasonable conduct than the negligence that supports civil liability. The deviation must create a high risk of death or serious bodily harm.
Supporting sources
The standard defines criminal negligence for involuntary manslaughter at common law. It also appears in other offenses that require proof of recklessness or criminal negligence.
Supporting sources
Depraved-heart murder requires reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life. Gross deviation for manslaughter involves a lower degree of risk and indifference.
Supporting sources
…extensive inroads upon the requirement of intention, however, are offenses of negligence, such as involuntary manslaughter or criminal negligence and the whole range of crimes arising from omission of duty. Cf. Commonwealth v. Welansky , 316 Mass. 383, 55 N.E. 2d 902 (1944). [^maj-9]: Holmes, The Common Law, considers intent in the…