Also known as: nepotistic · favoritism · cronyism
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The practice of bestowing official favors on one's relatives, especially in hiring or appointments to public office. Statutes and charters commonly prohibit such appointments within specified degrees of relationship and render them void.
Nia Nkosi, a city council member, sponsored a flow-control ordinance directing all municipal waste to a public facility operated by her brother. The ordinance survived Dormant Commerce Clause challenge because it favored a government-owned provider performing a traditional public function rather than a private entity. Nia faced removal proceedings under the local anti-nepotism charter for the appointment-like benefit conferred on her relative.
Nestor Navarro, union president, enforced a long-standing requirement that new members be related by blood or marriage to existing members. The policy produced an all-white workforce traceable to prior intentional discrimination. Black applicants sued under Title VII, arguing the nepotism rule perpetuated exclusion even though facially neutral.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Nathan Nguyen, plant manager, created an on-the-job training program open only to relatives of current employees. The program produced a workforce overwhelmingly composed of one racial group. Minority workers sued, alleging the nepotistic selection criterion violated Title VII despite the employer's claim of business necessity.
Naveen Nanda, fire department chief, discarded promotion test results after learning that his nephew would not advance. The city defended the decision as necessary to avoid disparate-impact liability. White firefighters who would have been promoted sued, claiming the action constituted intentional discrimination under Title VII.
Natalie Norris, human-resources director, implemented a layoff policy that retained only employees under a certain age, many of whom were her adult children and their spouses. Older workers sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The company argued the policy addressed economic concerns rather than age bias.
Neville Norton, base commander, refused to allow an airman to wear a yarmulke because the airman's uncle served on the base advisory board. The airman sued under the Free Exercise Clause. The military defended the uniform regulation as necessary to maintain discipline and avoid any appearance of favoritism toward relatives of advisors.
Most anti-nepotism statutes render the appointment void. The appointing officer may also face loss of office and possible criminal penalties.
Supporting sources
Yes. When a public official sues over a statement accusing her of steering grants to benefit a spouse, she must prove the defendant knew the allegation was false or acted with reckless disregard of its truth.
Supporting sources
Nepotism is a specific form of favoritism limited to relatives. When a union or employer adopts a nepotism rule that perpetuates prior racial exclusion, the facially neutral policy may still violate Title VII if it locks out protected groups.
Supporting sources
…have been the primary beneficiaries of this Court's pronouncements of absolute immunity gives support to this appearance of favoritism. [^maj-29]: See Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of United States , 446 U. S. 719 (1980); Butz v. Economou , 438 U. S. 478, 511 (1978). [^maj-30]: I will not speculate on…