Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A connection between a permit condition demanding dedication of land or payment and a legitimate governmental interest that would justify outright denial of the permit.
Sources & Authorities· 8 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Disproportionate Land Dedication
Noreen Nguyen seeks a permit to expand her store. The city conditions approval on her dedicating a strip of land for a bike path. The city offers no evidence that the path's size matches the traffic increase from the expansion. The condition fails the required connection test.
Easement Condition Challenged
Naveen Nanda applies to build a larger home. The county grants the permit only if he conveys a public beach easement across his lot. The easement does not mitigate any specific harm from the home expansion. The condition lacks the necessary link to a permit denial ground.
Neil Nair wants a permit to subdivide land. The city demands a cash payment for park improvements when he refuses to dedicate open space. The payment demand has no demonstrated tie to the subdivision's effects. Refusal to issue the permit triggers scrutiny under the connection standard.
Inevitable Discovery Link
Police obtain a confession from Noah Nakamura without proper warnings. Officers later locate the victim's body through an independent search already underway. The body evidence is admissible because the search path supplies the required connection to lawful discovery.
Nix v. Williams (Williams II)467 U.S. 431 (1984)
Taxpayer Standing Connection
Nikhil Narayan challenges federal spending on religious schools as a taxpayer. He shows his tax dollars flow directly to the challenged program. The suit proceeds because the financial link satisfies the standing requirement for constitutional claims.
Flast v. Cohen392 U.S. 83, 95 (1968)
Minimum Contacts Analysis
Norton Bank sues Natalie Norris in State A over a contract formed elsewhere. Norris has no office, agents, or transactions in State A. The court dismisses because no connection exists between the claim and any forum activity by Norris.
Hanson v. Denckla357 U.S. 235, 254 (1958)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What must the government prove to satisfy the nexus requirement in exaction cases?+
The government must show an essential connection between the demanded dedication or payment and a legitimate interest that would justify denying the permit outright. The link must address impacts caused by the proposed development itself.
Supporting sources
Does the nexus test apply to monetary demands as well as land dedications?+
Yes. The standards governing required connections and rough proportionality extend to permit denials based on rejected monetary conditions as well as physical dedications of property.
Supporting sources
How does the nexus requirement function in specific personal jurisdiction analysis?+
Each plaintiff's claim must arise out of or relate to the defendant's contacts with the forum. Similarity of claims among plaintiffs is insufficient without that claim-specific connection to forum activity.
Supporting sources
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…239 U. S. 33 (1915). Indeed, we do not read the appellee's brief as really asserting anything to the contrary. The "logical nexus between the status asserted and the claim sought to be adjudicated," Flast v. Cohen , 392 U. S., at 102, and the necessary degree of contentiousness, Golden v. Zwickler , 394 U. S.…